|
Rage Rage Rage
Rage Rage Rage Rage
Look forward in anger
or rage?
In May 1951, Dylan
Thomas wrote the poem Do Not Go Gentle into that
Good Night, addressing his father who was
approaching bundness and death. The final lines
are: Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light. In
1956, John Osborne's play Look Back In Anger was
first performed. Its main character Jimmy Porter
became known as the "Angry Young Man", and
typified the playwrights of Osborne's
generation. In the 1990s, it seems that English
language users are heeding the message of Thomas
rather than Osborne.
An AA Driver
Education Foundation article (http://www.aadef.co.nz/roadrage.shtml)
says: "In the late 1980s, drivers in the US,
apparently frustrated by increasing congestion,
began fighting and shooting each other on a
regular basis, victims of what the popular press
termed road rage." and goes on to inform us that
"In the US, unverified figures of up to 1200
road rage related deaths a year have been
reported." In a survey of 526 British motorists
carried out in January 1995, 90 per cent had
experienced "road rage" incidents in the
previous twelve months and 60 per cent admitted
to losing their tempers behind the wheel,
indulging in aggressive tailgating (driving very
close to the vehicle in front of you), headlight
flashing, obscene gestures, deliberate
obstruction of other vehicles, or verbal abuse.
1 per cent of drivers claim to have been
physically assaulted by other motorists.
But some people
insist that road rage is nothing new: the Oldie
magazine recently printed an item of carriage
rage from 1817: Last week I had a row on the
road with a fellow in a carriage who was
impudent to my horse. I gave him a swinging box
on the ear.
In the Bank of
English, a large computerized collection (or
corpus) of 1990s English language texts
containing 329 million words
(http://www.cobuild.collins.co.uk/boe_info.shtmll),
road rage occurs 249 times. The corpus also
reveals how quickly the rage phenomenon is
spreading to other aspects of our social
behaviour. In the 5859 corpus examples for rage,
we find that car drivers also encounter car
rage, driver rage, car-park rage (or parking
rage) and alarm rage (when their alarms go off
for no apparent reason in a quiet street,
offending victims of noise rage). Other forms of
transport are not immune: air rage (which became
particularly prominent in 1998 and 1999), rail
rage (or on London Underground, Tube rage), bike
rage, roller rage, and even pram rage.
Every activity seems
to generate rage: supermarket shoppers
experience trolley rage or checkout rage,
pedestrians exhibit pavement rage, workers have
to cope with work rage (keyboard rage in
offices, runway rage at airports), and phone
users meet with phone rage (also voicemail
rage). No areas of our cities are spared:
neighbour rage and neighbourhood rage flourish,
staff and customers find that bank rage (and
perhaps broker-rage) occurs in banks, bar rage
in pubs (also pub rage). Doctors are unable to
cure us, instead they have to deal with hospital
rage (or ward rage) in hospitals and steroid
users affected by "roid (steroid) rage". Indeed,
mental health professionals are now diagnosing
rage disorder.
Activities
specifically aimed at calming us down are no
longer effective: sports are giving rise to golf
rage, pool rage (swimmers), and piste rage
(skiers). Gentle gardeners are succumbing to
hose rage (joined by other water consumers in
water rage). Even yoga teachers report
meditation rage in their students. Animals, too,
are not immune: dogs suffer from canine rage
syndrome, and chickens from roost rage.
One could say: "rage
is all the rage"! Or as Shakespeare put it in
his Sonnets (number 65): Since brass, nor stone,
nor earth nor boundless sea, But said mortality
o'ersways their power, How with this rage shall
beauty hold a plea, Whose action is no stronger
than a flower?
So what can we do
about it? In a 1989 article in the Wall Street
Journal about "boot camps" for offenders, Bill
Earls asks: But will real or feigned anger work
with people who think rage is the norm, and that
punching, kicking or stabbing is an accepted way
to show displeasure?
To set the record
straight, although rage seems to have made a
sudden and forceful impact in the 1990s, it is
in fact anger which dominates the English
language. John Osborne, not Dylan Thomas, is the
watchword: the Bank of English has 13,551
examples of anger compared to the paltry 5,859
examples for rage reviewed above. But we tend
not to notice anger as much, because it occurs
much more frequently in books than in
newspapers. Which raises the question: should
literature or journalism be the touchstone of a
language?
original
here
|
Web page 'shames' bad drivers
From San Francisco Bureau Chief Greg Lefevre
SAN FRANCISCO,
California (CNN) -- Most drivers think the only
thing they have to worry about on the road is
getting stopped by police. Now, thanks to a new
home page on the World Wide Web, driver foul-ups
on California's Highway 17 will be available for
the world to see.
Curt Feigel and his
friend Emil Gallant travel the road looking for
bad drivers. The pair commute together through
the twisty roads of the Santa Cruz Mountains on
their way to work in Silicon Valley.
When they spot an
offender, Feigel whips out his digital camera,
takes a picture of the car and posts it along
with some choice comments about the bone-head
move on the Highway 17 Web Page of Shame, which
Gallant designed and maintains.
Original
continued here
|
The
Electronic Telegraph
Road rage is driving
Britain to distraction
John Langley, Motoring Correspondent
ALMOST three-quarters of drivers have been the
victims of road rage, according to the 1996
annual Lex Report on Motoring.
Aggressive behaviour,
ranging from gestures and verbal abuse to
physical attacks, is spoiling motoring for many
people, says the report.
During the past year,
1.8m have been forced to pull over or off the
road and 800,000 have been threatened.
Some 500,000 people
have had their cars deliberately driven into,
and 250,000 have been attacked by other drivers.
Another 250,000 have had their cars attacked by
another driver.
Road rage is more
common in cities, though here it is more likely
to take the form of verbal abuse or gesturing,
with 44 per cent claiming to have been victims
in the past 12 months.
In rural areas,
physical attacks are more likely, with nine per
cent being forced off the road during the year.
The survey of 1,229
drivers - and for the first time this year, 717
non-drivers - suggests evidence of a North-South
divide to the problem. Physical attacks or
threats were most common in London and the
South-East, the South-West and Wales.
Gestures and swearing
were more common in Scotland, the North and the
Midlands. Younger drivers and drivers who speed
were most likely to be the victims.
Traffic congestion
and "the pressure to get from A to B in time"
are among the reasons blamed for the road rage
phenomenon, which is claimed to be widespread.
The things which
upset drivers most were identified as cruising
in the middle lane (60 per cent) and outside
lane (55 per cent) on motorways, inside lane
overtakers (50 per cent), and speeding in towns
and cities (45 per cent).
|
The RAC last night called for a concerted campaign
by motorists, the police and the Government "to
drive violence off our roads". It said its
repeated calls for Government action to counter
aggression and violence had been met with
inaction.
"The buck has been
passed from Government department to department,
with the police denying the existence of 'road
rage' as a problem," said a spokesman. "The Lex
Report reveals the reality of motorists'
experience - stress, aggression and acts of
violence are on the increase."
Edmund King, the
RAC's head of campaigns, said statistics of road
rage should be compiled by the police. "We are
going round in circles," he said. "The police
say that road rage does not exist. We say how
can they say it does not exist if they do not
keep any statistics?
"We believe that
anyone who has been convicted of a serious
driving offence involving violence should have
to undergo counseling, and should not get their
licence back until they can show that they are
unlikely to offend again."
The Lex Report,
carried out by MORI, is one of the most
comprehensive annual reviews of opinion among
Britain's motorists.
It shows that a
growing number of drivers now agree with
non-drivers that public transport should be
improved, though there is little evidence that
they would forsake their cars to use it.
The majority want
more bypasses but there is little support for
building or widening motorways. Many support the
causes behind protests against congestion,
pollution and new road-building, though far
fewer back extreme methods used by some
protesters.
Sir George Young, the
Transport Secretary, said in a foreword that "we
are seeing a shift in public opinion from
road-based solutions towards less
environmentally damaging alternatives.
"Motorists are well
as non-car users seem to be increasingly aware
of the need for restraint measures."
|
ROAD RAGE - WAVE IT GOODBYE
The Guild of
Experienced Motorists, is urging its 65,000
members to 'wave away road rage'.
David Williams, the Guild's road safety officer,
said: "An appreciative or apologetic gesture can
without doubt bring about a change in attitude
from drivers around you. Acknowledging, with a
simple wave, any consideration directed at you,
or to apologize for making an error on the road,
will reduce incidents that can so often lead to
hostile behaviour and crashes."
Although the term 'road rage' is fairly new,
hostile and discourteous behaviour on the roads
in not. Indeed, as long ago at 1932 the Guild
was formed (under its original name of The
Company of Veteran Motorists) partly to
eliminate such 'ungentlemanly and unsafe'
behaviour. The Guild's slogan of the 3Cs - Care,
Courtesy and Concentration - still represents
the qualities needed by good, safe drivers," Mr
Williams continued.
The Guild, through its members' magazine Good
Motoring, recommends that all drivers follow its
lead and adopt a 'wave away road rage' policy.
David Williams
concluded: "The causes of road rage are many and
varied but some of the main factors which have
been identified are stress, fatigue and
frustration. If drivers were to adopt a more
courteous approach to their driving, these
factors could be greatly reduced and maybe the
problem of road rage could simply be waved
away."
|
Road warriors, relax!
Angry driving is bad for your health, experts say
From Correspondent Jeff Levine
WASHINGTON (CNN) --
Feeling stress behind the wheel may be a
familiar sensation for hundreds of drivers, but
some medical experts say it could be more than
just a temporary irritant. It could be a health
hazard.
A recent British
study shows 55 percent of commuters are stressed
on their daily drive to and from work.
"It feels like I want
to get out of the car, leave it there, and walk
the rest of the way," says one harried driver.
Original
continued here
|
AP (Honolulu) -- Nasty driving attitudes have
become a subject of scholarly study since
University of Hawaii psychology professor Leon
James began researching the minds of drivers.
James' study turned
up that "drivers are stressed out, threaten each
other, are in a bad mood, terrorize their
passengers, and often fantasize violent acts
against each other.:
He says this shows
there is a strong need for driving psychology
which can reverse this trend and alter our
driving style. He suggests driving counseling
services for the public.
Since the federal
government let states raise highway speed limits
last winter, an Associated Press survey found at
least eight states that did so have seen
increases in highway deaths. Yet four other
states that raised limits actually saw fatal
accidents drop slightly.
|
by Jeff Siegel
The psychological and
sociological condition known as road rage--which
has probably always been with us in one form or
another--seems to have taken on a new and
disconcerting prominence as the 20th century
comes to a close. According to a study by the
American Automobile Association, this decade has
already seen more than 200 people killed and
almost 13,000 injured as the result of a road
rage incident in the United States.
You've seen it happen
as you drive to work--someone tries to merge
onto the freeway and a driver in the right lane
speeds up to cut the incoming car off. You've
read about it in the newspaper--two drivers
chase each other down the highway for three or
four miles, waving and cursing at each other.
And you've seen it on TV--two motorists leave
their cars and continue their dispute on a
parking lot, sometimes even brandishing a gun.
It's road rage--and
while it may not be a new phenomenon, it
certainly does seem to have taken on a new and
disconcerting prominence.
"I'm sure that years
ago, it was called horse and carriage rage,"
says Len Tuzman, DSW, a specialist in road rage
who is the director of social work services at
Hillside Hospital at Long Island Jewish Medical
Center in New York. "In that respect, it isn't
anything new. But what is new is that it seems
more newsworthy than ever before."
Road rage, say people
who have studied the subject, is essentially an
expression of anger that usually has nothing to
do with traffic or driving. It is probably a
behavior related to "acting out", common among
teen-age boys who lose their temper and don't
have any real idea of why they go around the
house slamming doors and cursing their parents.
Regardless of the
source, road rage is a release of anger that may
have built up during the day and comes out when
you get in the car for the drive home. When you
wave your fist at someone who cuts you off, you
may be mad at your boss. When you're cut off by
another driver as you try to change lanes, you
may be the client who stiffed him on a big
order.
"It's not always a
good idea to get into the car after you've had a
fight with your mate," says Krishna Gujavarty,
MD, the chairman of the psychiatry department at
Nassau County Medical Center in East Meadow,
Long Island. "That's when you tend to drive
faster and more aggressively, and that's how the
trouble starts."
|
-- Last month,
Lee Parker, a 49-year-old father of five, was shot
to death by another motorist on the 7200 South
on-ramp. Hours later, police arrested 20-year-old
Jose Garcia Miramontes, who they say sideswiped
the victim's car before shooting him. He has been
charged with capital homicide.
-- In March, a man
fired shots into another car traveling on
Interstate 15, striking two occupants in the
hands. That same man is charged with brandishing
a weapon a few days later at another motorist
after a minor altercation in a parking lot.
-- In April, a Salt
Lake County woman was sentenced to 15 years in
prison in the March 1996 death of Joann Collett.
After a fender-bender, Collett got out of her
car to talk to Sharane Kearney, but Kearney
started to drive away. Collett then stepped in
front of Kearney's 1966 Lincoln Continental.
Kearney gunned the engine and hit Collett, whose
body was pinned under the car and dragged along
3900 South.
-- A South Jordan man
escaped without injury in April after another
motorist on I-215 fired shots into his car. Jeff
Jolley had honked as another car, driving in a
closed-off lane, passed him. As both cars exited
at 1300 South, occupants of a blue sports car
shot two rounds at Jolley's car.
-- Larry Lemm honked
at J.C. Edgar King's car because it was stopped
in the middle of 1300 West. That honk led to an
altercation that has left Lemm partly disabled
and the elderly King with a criminal conviction
on his otherwise clean record. The altercation
occurred Labor Day weekend 1995, and Lemm is
still fighting with King. ``You wonder when he's
going to take responsibility for it,'' said
Lemm, who has sued for damages in the incident,
which left him with two injured knees requiring
surgery. A fatal act of road rage happened in
Dallas in February. A delivery van driven by a
33-year-old man collided with a pickup driven by
a 42-year old man. A side mirror was broken in
the minor collision. The delivery driver got out
of the van and argued with the pickup driver.
The delivery man started punching the older man
as he sat in his truck. The punchee pulled out
his licensed, concealed .40-caliber handgun and
shot the puncher in the chest. Police charged
the shooter with murder, but a grand jury
refused to indict him, clearing him in the road
rage killing. Texas justice, baby.
Keith cites an
incident last year in which a motorist
confronted a Boston school bus driver who
allegedly cut him off. After spitting in the bus
driver's face, the motorist returned to his car.
Angered, the bus driver left his vehicle to
confront the motorist, only to receive a
thrashing in the street. "He beat the hell out
of him," Keith says.
Mike Hoffner,
regional coordinator with the Ohio School Bus
Safety Program in Circleville, says he recalls
an incident in which a bus driver pulled over
after being signaled by the driver of a
trash-hauling truck.
"The trucker didn't
look upset, so, not thinking, the driver opened
the door," Hoffner says. "He thought the guy was
going to tell him there might be something wrong
with the bus. Next thing he knew, the guy went
back to one of the teenagers and punched him,
bloodying his nose, and said 'thank you,' and on
his way he went."
Turns out the kids
had tossed a soda can at the trash hauler and
had followed that with a obscene hand gesture.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Such was the case in
Toledo recently, Webber said, when troopers
handled a crash involving a vehicle that
intentionally rammed a car carrying a mother and
father and their three kids. The reckless
driver, who was eventually charged with
felonious assault and driving under the
influence, told troopers he ran into the other
car because one of the children gave him an
"obscene finger gesture."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Road rage ends in
stabbing death - Milwaukee police said Wednesday
the death of 22-year-old John Sentowski, who was
stabbed repeatedly by another motorist Saturday
in the 4400 block of W. Sumac Place, was likely
a case of "road rage." Sentowski was stabbed
with an unknown instrument by the driver of
another car after a traffic disagreement
escalated from obscene gestures to violence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of the incidents
are so ludicrous you can't help but
laugh--albeit nervously. There was the case in
Salt Lake City, where 75-year-old J. C.
King--peeved that 41-year-old Larry Remm Jr.
honked at him for blocking traffic--followed
Remm when he pulled off the road, hurled his
prescription bottle at him, and then, in a
display of geriatric resolve, smashed Remm's
knees with his '92 Mercury. In tony Potomac,
Md., Robin Ficker--an attorney and ex-state
legislator--knocked the glasses off a pregnant
woman after she had the temerity to ask him why
he bumped her Jeep with his.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Ohio, there is a
mother of two who was jockeying for position on
a highway with a pregnant woman. She ended up
slamming on her brakes on purpose to SHOW HER
RAGE, and the pregnant woman hit a pole and went
flying....lost the baby. The mother of two was
sentenced to over a year in prison for Vehicular
Manslaughter of the fetus (cause Ohio has a
statute that recognizes the rights of a fetus).
This could be ANYONE of us who inappropriately
expresses him/herself this way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A bicyclist enraged
at being knocked off his bike by a car outside
Washington D.C. got up, pulled out a handgun and
shot the driver to death, police said on
Thursday. The bicyclist killed 19-year-old Joy
Mariano Enriquez, a college student, with a
single shot in the head. He ran off on foot but
was caught 10 minutes later, a Maryland police
statement said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Aug. 3, while
trying to park his car on South Street, a
23-year-old West Philly man was shot in the head
by another driver who wanted the spot. A week
later, an argument between the occupants of two
cars on Allegheny Avenue erupted into gunfire. A
19-year-old woman was shot in the head. On Aug.
12, the driver of a sport-utility vehicle tried
to run a van driver off the road in Upper Darby.
After a collision, the first driver stabbed the
second in the leg.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earlier this month, a
college professor pulled a gun on a federal drug
agent and the agent punched him, ending a
dispute that started on Interstate 43 near
downtown Milwaukee, according to police. The
agent told police the professor cut him off,
while the professor's attorney says the agent
turned his high beams on the professor's car.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The incident occurred
around 8:00 AM on Monday, August 10, when
Reader, who was driving a 1991 Chevrolet pickup
westbound on US 30, had been involved in a
verbal confrontation at Hillcrest Rd. with
another motorist, Nicholas Costea III, 31 of
Dover, regarding the brake lights on
Reader¹s pickup. Both drivers continued
westbound after the verbal confrontation until
they were stopped again behind traffic waiting
to turn. That¹s when Reader pointed a 9 mm
handgun out of the drivers window of the pickup
at Costea. Reader did not fire any shots from
the weapon. Costea reported the incident to a
trooper that was in the area. Reader turned
himself into troopers at the Wooster post of the
Highway Patrol a short time later, confessing
that he had pointed the gun at another motorist.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was the case in
Salt Lake City, where 75-year-old J. C.
King--peeved that 41-year-old Larry Remm Jr.
honked at him for blocking traffic--followed
Remm when he pulled off the road, hurled his
prescription bottle at him, and then, in a
display of geriatric resolve, smashed Remm's
knees with his '92 Mercury. In tony Potomac,
Md., Robin Ficker--an attorney and ex-state
legislator--knocked the glasses off a pregnant
woman after she had the temerity to ask him why
he bumped her Jeep with his.
In Colorado Springs,
55-year-old Vern Smalley persuaded a 17-year-old
boy who had been tailgating him to pull over;
Smalley decided that, rather than merely scold
the lad, he would shoot him. (And he did.
Fatally--after the youth had threatened him.)
And last year, on Virginia's George Washington
Parkway, a dispute over a lane change was
settled with a high-speed duel that ended when
both drivers lost control and crossed the center
line, killing two innocent motorists.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In another recent
county incident, a 3-year-old Fredericksburg
girl was critically injured when her father
engaged another motorist in a three-mile dispute
along Interstate 95 near Dumfries.
Robert Finck, 37, has
been charged with reckless driving and failure
to properly secure his daughter, Brenna, in a
child safety seat. He faces up to a year in
prison and a $2,500 fine when he appears in
Prince William General District Court on Feb. 7.
Finck and another
driver, Fred Lee Hamilton, 20, of Locust Grove,
chased each other down a three-mile stretch of
the highway last month until Finck collided with
another car and flipped into the median,
Caldwell said.
She said Finck and
Hamilton blamed each other for the dispute, each
saying the other pulled in front of their
vehicle, flashed headlights and made gestures.
``It's hard to
believe [Finck] would endanger flesh and blood
in that manner," said Commonwealth's Attorney
Paul Ebert, who often tries cases of reckless
driving caused by angry motorists. ``They might
as well have had two guns," he said.
From: Yahoo!
Coverage of Road Rage
|
USA News Cover Story
ROAD
RAGE
Tailgating, giving
the finger, outright violence--Americans grow
more likely to take out their frustrations on
other drivers BY JASON VEST, WARREN COHEN, AND
MIKE THARP
Some of the incidents
are so ludicrous you can't help but
laugh--albeit nervously. There was the case in
Salt Lake City, where 75-year-old J. C.
King--peeved that 41-year-old Larry Remm Jr.
honked at him for blocking traffic--followed
Remm when he pulled off the road, hurled his
prescription bottle at him, and then, in a
display of geriatric resolve, smashed Remm's
knees with his '92 Mercury. In tony Potomac,
Md., Robin Ficker--an attorney and ex-state
legislator--knocked the glasses off a pregnant
woman after she had the temerity to ask him why
he bumped her Jeep with his.
Other incidents lack
even the element of black humor. In Colorado
Springs, 55-year-old Vern Smalley persuaded a
17-year-old boy who had been tailgating him to
pull over; Smalley decided that, rather than
merely scold the lad, he would shoot him. (And
he did. Fatally--after the youth had threatened
him.) And last year, on Virginia's George
Washington Parkway, a dispute over a lane change
was settled with a high-speed duel that ended
when both drivers lost control and crossed the
center line, killing two innocent motorists.
Anyone who spent the
Memorial Day weekend on the road probably won't
be too surprised to learn the results of a major
study to be released this week by the American
Automobile Association: The rate of "aggressive
driving" incidents--defined as events in which
an angry or impatient driver tries to kill or
injure another driver after a traffic
dispute--has risen by 51 percent since 1990. In
those cases studied, 37 percent of offenders
used firearms against other drivers, an
additional 28 percent used other weapons, and 35
percent used their cars.
Fear of (and
participation in) aggressive driving has grown
so much that in a poll last year residents of
Maryland, Washington, D.C., and Virginia listed
it as a bigger concern than drunk driving. The
Maryland highway department is running a
campaign called "The End of the Road for
Aggressive Drivers," which, among other things,
flashes anti-road-rage messages on electronic
billboards on the interstates. Delaware,
Pennsylvania, and New Jersey have initiated
special highway patrols targeting aggressive
drivers. A small but busy community of
therapists and scholars has arisen to study the
phenomenon and counsel drivers on how to cope.
And several members of Congress are now trying
to figure out ways to legislate away road rage.
Lest one get unduly
alarmed, it helps to put the AAA study's numbers
in context: Approximately 250,000 people have
been killed in traffic since 1990. While the
U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that
two thirds of fatalities are at least partially
caused by aggressive driving, the AAA study
found only 218 that could be directly
attributable to enraged drivers. Of the more
than 20 million motorists injured, the survey
identified 12,610 injuries attributable to
aggressive driving. While the study is the first
American attempt to quantify aggressive driving,
it is not rigorously scientific. The authors
drew on reports from 30 newspapers--supplemented
by insurance claims and police reports from 16
cities--involving 10,037 occurrences. Moreover,
the overall trendlines for car accidents have
continued downward for several decades, thanks
in part to increases in the drinking age and
improvements in car technology like high-mounted
brake lights.
But researchers
believe there is a growing trend of simple
aggressive behavior--road rage--in which a
driver reacts angrily to other drivers. Cutting
them off, tailgating, giving the finger, waving
a fist--experts believe these forms of
nonviolent fury are increasing. "Aggressive
driving is now the most common way of driving,"
says Sandra Ball-Rokeach, who codirects the
Media and Injury Prevention Program at the
University of Southern California. "It's not
just a few crazies--it's a subculture of
driving."
In focus groups set
up by her organization, two thirds of drivers
said they reacted to frustrating situations
aggressively. Almost half admitted to
deliberately braking suddenly, pulling close to
the other car, or taking some other potentially
dangerous step. Another third said they
retaliated with a hostile gesture. Drivers show
great creativity in devising hostile responses.
Doug Erber of Los Angeles keeps his
windshield-wiper-fluid tank full. If someone
tailgates, he turns on the wipers, sending fluid
over his roof onto the car behind him. "It works
better than hitting the brakes," he says, "and
you can act totally innocent."
Mad Max.
While the AAA authors
note there is a profile of the lethally inclined
aggressive driver--"relatively young, poorly
educated males who have criminal records,
histories of violence, and drug or alcohol
problems"--road-rage scholars (and regular
drivers) believe other groups are equally
represented in the less violent forms of
aggressive driving. To some, it's tempting to
look at this as a psychologically mysterious
Jekyll-and-Hyde phenomenon; for others, it's
simply attributable to "jerk drivers." In
reality, there's a confluence of emotional and
demographic factors that changes the average
citizen from mere motorist to Mad Max.
First, it isn't just
your imagination that traffic is getting worse.
Since 1987, the number of miles of roads has
increased just 1 percent while the miles driven
have shot up by 35 percent. According to a
recent Federal Highway Administration study of
50 metropolitan areas, almost 70 percent of
urban freeways today--as opposed to 55 percent
in 1983--are clogged during rush hour. The study
notes that congestion is likely to spread to
currently unspoiled locations. Forty percent of
the currently gridlock-free Milwaukee County
highway system, for example, is predicted to be
jammed up more than five hours a day by the year
2000. A study by the Texas Transportation
Institute last year found that commuters in one
third of the largest cities spent well over 40
hours a year in traffic jams.
Part of the problem
is that jobs have shifted from cities to
suburbs. Communities designed as residential
suburbs with narrow roads have grown into "edge
cities," with bustling commercial traffic.
Suburb-to-suburb commutes now account for 44
percent of all metropolitan traffic versus 20
percent for suburb-to-downtown travel.
Demographer and Edge City author Joel Garreau
says workers breaking for lunch are essentially
causing a third rush hour. He notes that in
Tysons Corner, Va., it takes an average of four
traffic signal cycles to get through a typical
intersection at lunchtime. And because most mass
transit systems are of a spoke-and-hub design,
centering on cities and branching out to
suburbs, they're not really useful in getting
from point A to point B in an edge city or from
one edge city to another. Not surprisingly,
fewer people are relying on mass transit and
more on cars. In 1969, 82.7 percent drove to
work; in 1990, 91.4 percent did. Despite the
fact that the Washington, D.C., area has an
exemplary commuter subway system, it accounts
for only 2 percent of all trips made.
Demographic changes
have helped put more drivers on the road. Until
the 1970s, the percentage of women driving was
relatively low, and many families had only one
car. But women entered the work force and bought
cars, something developers and highway planners
hadn't foreseen. From 1969 to 1990 the number of
women licensed to drive increased 84 percent.
Between 1970 and 1987, the number of cars on the
road more than doubled. In the past decade, the
number of cars grew faster (17 percent) than the
number of people (10 percent). Even carpooling
is down despite HOV lanes and other preferential
devices. The cumulative effect, says University
of Hawaii traffic psychology professor Leon
James, is a sort of sensory overload. "There are
simply more cars--and more behaviors--to deal
with," says James.
As if the United
States couldn't produce enough home-grown lousy
drivers, it seems to be importing them as well.
Experts believe that many immigrants come from
countries that have bad roads and aggressive
styles. It's not just drivers from Third World
countries, though. British drivers are
considered among the safest in Europe, yet
recent surveys show that nearly 90 percent of
British motorists have experienced threats or
abuse from other drivers. Of Brits who drive for
a living, about 21 percent report having been
run off the road. In Australia, one study
estimates that about half of all traffic
accidents there may be due to road rage. "There
are different cultures of driving all over the
world--quite clearly, if we mix new cultures in
the melting pot, what we get is a culture clash
on the roadway," says John Palmer, a professor
in the Health Education and Safety Department at
Minnesota's St. Cloud State University.
The peak moment for
aggressive driving comes not during impenetrable
gridlock but just before, when traffic density
is high but cars are still moving briskly.
That's when cutting someone off or forcing
someone out of a lane can make the difference
(or so it seems) between being on time and being
late, according to Palmer.
Unfortunately, roads
are getting more congested just as Americans
feel even more pressed for time. "People get on
a time line for their car trips," says Palmer.
"When they perceive that someone is impeding
their progress or invading their agenda, they
respond with what they consider to be
`instructive' behavior, which might be as simple
as flashing their lights to something more
combative."
Suburban assault
vehicles. This, uh, "instruction" has become
more common, Palmer and others speculate, in
part because of modern automotive design. With
hyperadjustable seats, soundproof interiors, CD
players, and cellular phones, cars are virtually
comfortable enough to live in. Students of
traffic can't help but wonder if the popularity
of pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles has
contributed to the problem. Sales have
approximately doubled since 1990. These big
metal shells loom over everything else, fueling
feelings of power and drawing out a driver's
more primal instincts. "A lot of the anecdotal
evidence about aggressive driving incidents
tends to involve people driving sport utility
vehicles," says Julie Rochman of the Insurance
Institute for Highway Safety. "When people get
these larger, heavier vehicles, they feel more
invulnerable." While Chrysler spokesman Chris
Preuss discounts the notion of suburban assault
vehicles being behind the aggressive-driving
phenomenon, he does say women feel more secure
in the jumbo-size vehicles.
In much of life,
people feel they don't have full control of
their destiny. But a car--unlike, say, a career
or a spouse--responds reliably to one's wish. In
automobiles, we have an increased (but false)
sense of invincibility. Other drivers become
dehumanized, mere appendages to a competing
machine. "You have the illusion you're alone and
master, dislocated from other drivers," says
Hawaii's James.
Los Angeles
psychologist Arnold Nerenberg describes how one
of his recent patients got into an angry road
confrontation with another motorist. "They
pulled off the road and started running toward
each other to fight, but then they recognized
each other as neighbors," he says. "When it's
just somebody else in a car, it's more
two-dimensional; the other person's identity
boils down to, `You're someone who did something
bad to me.' "
How can aggressive
driving be minimized? Some believe that better
driver's education might help. Driver's ed was a
high school staple by the 1950s, thanks to
federal highway dollars given to states. But a
1978 government study in De Kalb County, Ga.,
found no reduction in crashes or traffic
violations by students who took a driver's ed
course compared with those who didn't. Rather
than use these results to design better driver's
ed programs, the feds essentially gave up on
them and diverted money to seat belt and
anti-drunk-driving programs. Today, only 40
percent of new drivers complete a formal
training course, which may be one reason 20
percent to 35 percent of applicants fail their
initial driving test.
The inner driver. But
governments are looking anew at the value of
driver's education. In April, Michigan passed
sweeping rules that grant levels of privilege
depending on one's age and driving record.
States with similar systems, like California,
Maryland, and Oregon, have seen teen accident
rates drop.
Those who lose their
licenses often have to return to traffic school.
But some states have generous standards for
these schools. To wit: California's theme
schools. There, errant drivers can attend the
"Humor's My Name, Traffic's My Game," school, in
which a mock jury led by a stand-up comic
decides who the worst drivers are; the "Traffic
School for Chocoholics," which plies errant
drivers with chocolate and ice cream; and the
gay and lesbian "Pink Triangle Traffic School."
But the real key to
reducing road rage probably lies deep within
each of us. Professor James of the University of
Hawaii suggests that instead of emphasizing
defensive driving--which implies that the other
driver is the enemy--we should focus on
"supportive driving" or "driving with the aloha
spirit." Of course that's hard to do if a)
someone has just cut you off at 60 mph or b) you
live in Los Angeles instead of Hawaii.
Nerenberg, the Los Angeles psychologist, has
published an 18-page booklet called "Overcoming
Road Rage: The 10-Step Compassion Program." He
recommends examining what sets off road rage and
to "visualize overcoming it." Other tips:
Imagine you might be seeing that person at a
party soon. And remember that other drivers "are
people with feelings. Let us not humiliate them
with our aggression." In the chapter titled,
"Peace," he suggests, "Take a deep breath and
just let it go." And if that doesn't work, the
windshield-wiper trick is pretty clever.
With Anna Mulrine,
Mary Lord, Brendan I. Koerner, Barbra Murray,
and Steven D. Kaye
Original
here
|
July 22, 1997
A Founding
Father's rules
might cure raging drivers
by Michelle Malkin Seattle Times editorial
columnist
Federal highway
safety officials warned last week that "road
rage" - an epidemic of vein-popping,
middle-finger-thrusting, horn-honking,
high-beam-flashing, vehicle-ramming proportions
- is on the rise and getting deadlier.
(...)
Naturally, a new
breed of experts in "traffic psychology" has
arisen to provide a cure. They converged upon
Congress last week peddling 3-step, 5-step, and
10-step programs to "acquire inner power at the
wheel" and "engineer your own driving
personality make-over." These gridlock gurus
warned the House Transportation Committee that
the world's car-bound population is facing a
mental health crisis.
(...)
Most rage-related
incidents, the experts explain, arise from
trivial causes over parking spaces, obscene
gestures, tailgating and turn signals. Thus the
need, says renowned traffic psychologist Leon
James (a k a "Dr. Driving") at the University of
Hawaii, for specialized professional treatment
to "slay your driving dragon" and "acquire
personal self-management techniques as a
driver."
(...)
Other experts blame
an underlying lack of self-esteem for violent
outbursts on wheels and propose extensive
counseling to bolster the "emotional
intelligences" of impaired drivers.
But why shell out
precious tax dollars for such expensive
20th-century quackery? The problem isn't absence
of self-esteem - but an utter lack of
self-restraint. Two-and-a-half centuries ago,
our Founding Father, George Washington,
subscribed to a more cost-effective and
time-tested program for reining in one's inner
dragons. He carried a hand-copied list of
self-improvement rules, originally set out by
16th-century Jesuit priests, wherever he went -
from Valley Forge to Yorktown and throughout his
presidency. The original manuscript is kept at
the Library of Congress; rage-prone readers can
purchase a newly published version of
Washington's 110-step plan, with wry annotations
by Richard Brookhiser, called "Rules of
Civility: The 110 Precepts that Guided our First
President in War and Peace" (Free Press: $16).
This elegant, pocket-sized tome should be
required reading for all licensed drivers.
Like many modern
road-ragers, Washington was a hothead who faced
mounting stress at work and at home. As
Brookhiser notes, "Washington had a lot to be
angry about over the course of his career:
untrained soldiers, incompetent officers,
difficult allies, quarrelsome associates
(including Thomas Jefferson) - to say nothing of
his own mistakes from losing battles to
misjudging people . . . But if he had gone into
uncontrollable rages at every disappointment or
disaster, he would have ruined his health,
besides ruining his effectiveness as a leader."
Rather than let it all hang out, Washington
tempered his temper by adhering to some basic
rules of civil life:
Rule 1: "Every action
done in company ought to be done with some sign
of respect to those that are present."
(Modern translation
for motorists: Don't give other drivers the
finger when your mom is in the car. And leave
the Marilyn Manson tape at home.)
Rule 22: "Shew not
yourself glad at the misfortune of another
though he were you enemy."
(Don't laugh when the
tailgating jerk in the Army green Humvee gets
pulled over by the cops.)
Rule 45: "In
reproving shew no sign of choler, but do it with
all sweetness and mildness."
(Smile when you
chastise that student driver for stealing your
parking space at the mall.)
Rule 49: "Use no
reproachful language against any one, neither
curse nor revile."
Rule 110: "Labor to
keep alive in your breast that little spark of
celestial fire called conscience."
Washington worked
hard to master the smallest gestures; success
and survival in public life, he realized early
on, began with self-regulation in dress,
conversation and dining. The effect of all the
rules taken together, notes Brookhiser, "is to
remind you that you should not just do whatever
feels right, or the first thing that comes into
your head; rather you should always be mindful
of other people, and remember that they have
sensibilities and feelings of self-respect, that
deserve your respect." Even if they've just cut
you off in traffic or dozed off at a stoplight.
For men and motorists
who aspire to something higher than boorishness,
the "Rules of Civility" serve as clear and
fundamental rules of the road without the
psychobabble. Simple good manners, Washington
taught, are the first step to greatness - and
they may even save lives.
|
Experts say ignorance contributes to road rage
Good driving
is difficult when rude is the rule
From Correspondent
Kathleen Koch
WASHINGTON (CNN) --
The term "road rage" is new to the American
lexicon and bespeaks an explosive,
behind-the-wheel ugliness that sometimes ends in
tragedy.
Experts say there are
a number of reasons for it. Crowded highways
cause tailgating and near-collisions, they say.
Another reason is the great urgency Americans
have to reach their destination fast.
(...)
"When we get behind a
car, some demon takes over and we become
discourteous, illegal drivers that cause a lot
of problems," says Terry Gainer, director of the
Illinois State Police.
Safe-driving campaign
starting A consumer coalition launching a
nationwide safe-driving campaign believes that
the majority of drivers, driven by a variety of
pressures, let courtesy slide.
"First, driving has
increased more rapidly than the road capacity,"
says Stephen Brobeck, executive director of the
Consumer Federation of America. "Second, people
seem to be under more pressure, under more
stress."
But many who are rude
on the road simply ignore traffic rules, or have
forgotten them, or never learned them at all.
Times have changed since the 1970s, when 90
percent of people took drivers' education
courses.
"Today, our estimate
is that that's about 35 percent of the people,"
says Allen Robinson of the American Driver and
Traffic Safety Association. "If people are not
aware of what they should do, how do we blame
them for what they don't do properly?"
(...)
In a survey of more
than 1,000 adults, the consumer coalition found
that 64 percent believed people are driving much
less courteously and safely than five years ago.
The solutions they
offered include more driver education, warnings
or tickets from law enforcement officers and
refresher driving courses for all adults similar
to those required in some states for senior
citizens.
No one can say just
how much rude driving costs in terms of
accidents and deaths, but some worry that it is
the beginning of a vicious cycle of truly
aggressive driving that can turn roadways into
battle zones.
original
here
|
'Road Rage' Hits I-494
An incident that must hover
frighteningly in the back of any commuter's
mind occurred this morning on Interstate 494
as it winds near South St. Paul, reports
WCCO-Radio.
A 45-year-old
commuter, changing lanes to allow a truck to
enter the west-bound lane of the interstate at
about 8 a.m., cut in front of a lumber truck
during this morning's commute, apparently
angering the 26-year-old truck driver from
Minneapolis who allegedly swerved his rig toward
the car.
The truck driver then
motioned the commuter (pictured right with his
back to the camera) to pull to the side of the
road, which the man apparently did, and a fight
ensued. The commuter, who didn't want to be
identified, told WCCO-TV that he was punched
repeatedly in the face and was hospitalized,
requiring internal and external stitches. (RA)
-- 25 seconds
A passerby who saw
the action stopped and is credited with breaking
up the fight and then following the driver while
calling 911.
State troopers
arrived and arrested the lumber truck about five
miles from where the fight took place. Captain
Kevin Kittridge of the State Patrol told
WCCO-Radio that the truck driver is facing
third-degree assault charges in the incident.
The television
station reports the truck driver -- who received
his license to drive the rig about one year ago
-- has a string of driving violations on his
record, including fleeing a police officer.
A national survey
released Thursday reveals one-in-five admit to
'aggressive driving' and that women are more
likely than men to tailgate.
Parker Hodges,
Channel 4000 Staff Writer
|
Time Magazine
Society, Vol. 151 No.
1
Road Rage
Aggressive driving is America's car sickness du
jour. But is there a cure for thinking everyone
else on the road is an idiot?
Andrew Ferguson
It's a jungle out
there. well, not really: it's worse than a
jungle. It's a stretch of roadway anywhere in
America, and in place of the ravenous tigers and
stampeding rhinos and slithery anacondas are
your friends and neighbors and co-workers, that
nice lady from the church choir and the cheerful
kid who bags your food at the local Winn
Dixie--even Mom and Dad and Buddy and Sis.
They're in a hurry. And you're in their way. So
step on it! That light is not going to get any
greener! Move it or park it! Tarzan had it easy.
Tarzan didn't have to drive to work.
It may be morning in America--crime down,
incomes up, inflation
nonexistent--but it's high noon on the country's
streets and highways. This is road recklessness,
auto anarchy, an epidemic of wanton carmanship.
Almost everyone from anywhere has a story about
it, as fresh as the memory of this morning's
commute. And no wonder. Incidents of "road rage"
were up 51% in the first half of the decade,
according to a report from the AAA Foundation
for Traffic Safety. Some occurrences are grisly
enough to make the headlines. Last year a
high-speed racing duel on the George Washington
Memorial Parkway outside Washington killed two
innocent commuters, including a mother of two,
traveling in the opposite direction.
More often the new ethos of road anarchy
manifests itself in the mundane: the unsignaled
lane change by the driver next to you, the guy
who tailgates you if you go too slow, and the
person ahead who brakes abruptly if you go too
fast--each transgression accented by a flip of
the bird or a blast of the horn. Sixty-four
percent of respondents to a recent Coalition for
Consumer Health and Safety poll say people are
driving less courteously and more dangerously
than they were five years ago.
And the enemy is us. Take a ride with "Anne," a
40-year-old mother of three who would rather we
not use her real name, as she steers her 2
1/2-ton black Chevy Suburban out of her driveway
on a leafy street in residential Washington. The
clock on the dashboard reads 2:16. She has 14
minutes to make it to her daughter's game.
Within a block of her house she has hit 37
m.p.h., taking stop signs as suggestions rather
than law. She has a lot on her mind. "I'm not
even thinking of other cars," Anne admits
cheerfully as she lays on the horn. An oldster
in an econo-box ahead of her has made the near
fatal mistake of slowing at an intersection with
no stop sign or traffic light. Anne swears and
peels off around him.
Anne has a clean driving record with scarcely
even a fender bender to her name. But when she
takes to the highway, even her kids join the
fun. "Make him move over!" they shout as she
bears down on a 55-m.p.h. sluggard in the fast
lane. She flashes her headlights. The kids cheer
when the unlucky target gives in and moves
aside. Back in town, Anne specializes in near
misses. "Jeez, I almost hit that woman," she
chirps, swinging the Suburban into the right
lane to pass a car turning left at an
intersection. She makes the game two minutes
late. "I don't think I'm an aggressive driver,"
Anne says. "But there are a lot of bad drivers
out there."
Too true, too true. But the example of
Anne--prosperous, well-adjusted Anne, loving
wife and mother--raises the overarching question
of road anarchy. Residents of late 20th century
America are arguably the luckiest human beings
in history: the most technologically pampered,
the richest, the freest things on two legs the
world has ever seen. Then why do we drive like
such jerks?
The most common answer: What do you mean we,
Kemo Sabe? Of course, you don't drive like a
jerk. Neither does Anne--just ask her. Very few
drivers admit to being an obnoxious road
warrior. There seem to be only three types of
people on the road these days: the insane (those
who drive faster than you), the moronic (those
who drive slower than you) and...you. But this
merely confuses the issue. Surely someone is
doing all that speeding, tailgating, headlight
flashing and abrupt lane changing, not to
mention the bird flipping and horn blasting.
There's enough in the phenomenon of road rage to
keep a faculty-loungeful of social theorists
thinking deeply for years--or at least until the
grant money runs out.
That won't be any time soon. With millions of
victims and hardly any confessed perpetrators,
road recklessness has become the car-related
sickness du jour, deposing (for the moment)
drunk driving from its long-standing reign. Like
drunk driving, the issue has energized America's
vast machinery of social concern. The Federal
Government is spending money on research,
Congress has held hearings, law-enforcement
authorities have held seminars and developed
special enforcement programs, and psychologists
are treating it as a genuine, stand-alone
disorder. There are Websites devoted to the
topic, including one--the Database of Unsafe
Driving--that allows Web users to enter not only
an account of their experience with an
aggressive driver but also the "insane moron's"
license-plate number, along with a proposed
punishment. (Several of these--surprise!--are
obscene.)
Aggressive driving, of course, has been around
since the early decades of this century, from
the moment when the average number of
automobiles on any given roadway rose from 1 to
2. It is partly a matter of numbers. There are
17% more cars in America than there were 10
years ago, while the number of drivers is up
10%. More to the point: the number of miles
driven has increased 35% since 1987, while only
1% more roads have been built.
But as the quantity of cars has risen, the
nature of the problem has changed qualitatively
as well. Maybe the congestion is making everyone
cranky. Americans are famously attached to their
cars; it's just the driving they can't stand.
"Driving and habitual road rage have become
virtually inseparable," says Leon James, a
professor of psychology at the University of
Hawaii who specializes in the phenomenon. In the
most comprehensive national survey on driving
behavior so far, a Michigan firm, EPIC-MRA,
found that an astounding 80% of drivers are
angry most or all of the time while driving.
Simple traffic congestion is one cause of
irritation, but these days just about anything
can get the average driver to tap his horn. More
than one-third of respondents to the Michigan
survey said they get impatient at stoplights or
when waiting for a parking space; an additional
25% can't stand waiting for passengers to get in
the car. And 22% said they get mad when a
multi-lane highway narrows.
So not only are roads more crowded than ever,
but they are crowded with drivers whom science
has now discovered to be extremely touchy.
Modern life offers plenty of ready-made excuses
for bad driving, and here as elsewhere time
seems to be of the essence: there's just not
enough of it. When police departments in the
Washington area launched a program to crack down
on aggressive driving last year, cops handed out
some 60,000 tickets in 28 days for offenses
ranging from tailgating to passing on the right.
The most common excuse: "I'm late."
So many miles, so little time. For Ron Remer,
47, a soft-spoken salesman, offensive driving
was simply part of the job. From his home in New
Haven, Conn., he logged 30,000 miles a year
selling promotional products. "People on the
road were an impediment to my progress," he
says. "If I was late, it would reflect badly on
me. Maybe the customer wouldn't want the
products, and I'd be out of a sale. Getting
there was the only thing that was important. If
I met you in person, I might invite you for
coffee or something. But on the road, you were
in my way."
Remer says he's reformed now, having had one of
those little epiphanies that sometimes come to
people who are pulled over by the state police.
He was stopped one night on the narrow and
unlighted Merritt Parkway in Connecticut after a
high-speed race with another car, and soon
thereafter he enrolled in a seminar for
aggressive drivers. "I was lucky to recognize my
problem and try to fix it," he says.
Other road warriors are unrepentant. Alan
Carter, 43, a computer specialist from North
Carolina and a self-described "aggressive
driver," has his own vision of a perfect
commute: one with no other cars in sight. "I
don't want anyone in front of me. Any time. I
think maybe this type of thinking has its roots
in the minutiae of territorial rights and
typical American individualism. But I don't
really think about the deeper meanings. I just
know that someone else is in my space or in the
space I want."
Carter doesn't have to search for deeper
meanings; that is a job for paid professionals,
of whom, in America, there are many. Their
theories range from the sociological to the
psychological to the quasi political. "There is
a greater diversity of road users now than at
any other time in history," says Hawaii's James.
"Therefore streets are not reserved for the
optimum, skilled driver but accommodate a
variety of driver groups with varying skill,
acuity and emotional control"--jerks, in
nontechnical lingo. And unlike in previous
generations, the willingness to be a jerk on the
road is no longer confined to a single sex.
Ed Sarpolus, the head researcher for the
Michigan study of driving behavior, was struck
by the gender breakdown of aggressive drivers:
53% of them are women. "There is a tremendous
cultural shift taking place," he says. "Men
still outnumber women in pure numbers, but women
are not only increasing, they are not falling
off as they get older. Women have fought to be
equal in the workplace and in society, and now
they're fighting to be equal behind the wheel.
[Our] data are full of soccer moms."
This democratization of the highway has occurred
simultaneously to a decline in traditional
driver's education, once a near universal part
of the curriculum in America's secondary
schools--and a course beloved by generations of
high schoolers, since the only way you could
fail was by running over the instructor's cat.
According to Allen Robinson, CEO of the American
Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association,
15 years ago, nearly 90% of all new drivers had
taken an official driver's education course.
With budget cuts chopping the course out of many
public schools, that figure is down to 50%,
perhaps as low as 30%.
And Robinson questions the use of the courses
that are still in place. Having simplified the
instruction of reading, writing and arithmetic,
the American educational establishment may have
finally managed to do the impossible: it has
dumbed down even driver's ed. (What's next?
Dodge ball?) Some states have backed off
mandatory driver training altogether, and
elsewhere most courses demand no more than six
hours behind the wheel. In what was no doubt an
exceptional case, last September a North
Carolina driver's ed teacher allegedly told his
trainee to chase a driver who had cut them off,
then got out and punched the offending driver.
The teacher (who later denied he had urged the
student to step on the gas) was arrested. The
student was not ticketed, and the assault charge
against the teacher was dropped. "Our driving
schools teach the mechanics of driving," says
John Larson, a psychiatrist who lectures at Yale
Medical School, "but they teach almost nothing
about the psychology of drivers."
Driving is a curious combination of public and
private acts. A car isolates a driver from the
world even as it carries him through it. The
sensation of personal power is intoxicating.
Sealed in your little pod, you control the
climate with the touch of a button, from Arctic
tundra to equatorial tropic. The cabin is
virtually soundproof. Your "pilot's chair" has
more positions than a Barcalounger. You can't
listen to that old Sammy Davis Jr. tape at home
because your kids will think you're a dweeb, but
in the car, the audience roars as you belt out
I've Gotta Be Me. Coffee steams from the cup
holder, a bag of Beer Nuts sits open at your
side, and God knows you're safe. The safety belt
is strapped snugly across your body, and if that
fails, the air bag will save your life--if it
doesn't decapitate you. Little bells and lights
go off if you make a mistake: don't forget to
buckle up! Change your oil, you sleepyhead! The
illusions--of power, of anonymity, of
self-containment--pile up. You are the master of
your domain. Actually driving the car is the
last thing you need to worry about. So you can
pick your nose, break wind, fantasize to your
heart's content. Who's to know?
The fantasies are shaped not only by the
comforts of the cars but by their sheer tonnage
as well. The organization man of the 1950s might
have been satisfied with a workadaddy DeSoto; in
the 1970s the aspiring hipster could relieve his
mid-life crisis with an Italian sports car the
size of a Shriner go-cart. Affluent Americans of
the 1990s--so responsible at home, so productive
in the workplace--want a car designed for war.
With its four-wheel drive and tons of torque and
booster-rocket horsepower, today's
sports-utility vehicle would have come in handy
at the Battle of the Bulge. On the road its
driver faces no obstacle more menacing than a
pothole, but he knows that if he wants, he can
swing off the highway and climb a sand dune,
ford a raging river, grind deep into a trackless
wilderness. Of course, he never does. He has to
drive the kids to soccer practice. But the
unused capacity hums beneath the pedals at his
feet and feeds the fantasy. Watch him roar past
you on the road, and see the set of his jaw and
the squint of his eye. This is not some
corporate paper pusher at the wheel; this is no
sensitive dad who does the laundry. This is
Patton leading the Third Army. This is Chuck
Yeager breaking the sound barrier. Disrupt his
fantasy at your peril. "There is a real illusion
of anonymity combined with potency because you
have a machine you can command," says Jack
Levin, a sociologist at Northeastern
University's Program for the Study of Violence.
"Top it off with the stress of work and people
perhaps feeling insecure there, or with troubles
at home, and it can make for a dangerous
combination."
Road-rage experts have come up with various
solutions to the anarchy of our streets and
highways. We could legislate it (lower speed
limits, build more roads to relieve congestion),
adjudicate it (more highway cops, stiffer
penalties), regulate it (more elaborate
licensing procedures) or educate it away
(mandatory driver's ed). Others suggest an
option perhaps more typical of America circa
1998: therapize it.
"The road-rage habit can be unlearned," says
James of the University of Hawaii, "but it takes
more than conventional driver's ed." He
advocates teaching "emotional intelligence" as
part of any thorough driver training: how to
"deal with hostility expressed by drivers" and
"how to be accepting of diversity and how to
accommodate it." He calls for a new driver's ed
program from kindergarten on--to teach "a spirit
of cooperation rather than competition"--and
grass-roots organizations called Quality Driving
Circles. These, he told a radio station, would
be "small groups of people meeting regularly
together to discuss their driving problems and
help one another do driving-personality
makeovers."
Will it work? A better question might be, Do we
want it to? Road-rage therapists come perilously
close to calling for a transformation of the
national character--remaking our
rough-and-tumble, highly individualistic country
into a large-scale version of a college town
where everyone recycles kitty litter, drinks
latte, listens to Enya and eats whole grains. Is
that really what we want? For all its dangers,
road rage may simply be a corruption of those
qualities that Americans have traditionally, and
rightly, admired: tenacity, energy,
competitiveness, hustle--something, in other
words, to be contained and harnessed by
etiquette and social censure rather than
eradicated outright. Until then, alas, anyone
braving the streets and highways of America
would be well advised to employ a technique
older than therapy: prayer.
--Reported by Sally B. Donnelly /Washington
Why It's Crazy Out There
Don't talk with your mouth full; say please and
thank you; and for goodness sake, use a tissue.
We are taught from the crib to avoid bad habits
and cultivate good ones. But not on the road.
There's nothing wrong with our highways that an
Emily Post can't fix. Traffic-safety experts
have noted the most common (and annoying) bad
habits of bad drivers everywhere (i.e., everyone
else):
Using the cell phone. O.K., Hotshot, we get the
idea: you're important. Now can't the lbo wait
till you get back to the office?
Eating in the car. Do you drive in your dining
room?
Screaming, cursing, using obscene hand gestures.
Yo. This is a highway, not a Marilyn Manson
video.
Tailgating. Is that your hood ornament, or are
you just glad to see me?
Cutting off other drivers. Cutting in line at
the movies is rude; cutting in front of someone
armed with a three-ton sport ute is suicide.
Driving too fast. The only thing more dangerous
than driving too fast is...
Driving too slow.
Failing to yield to pedestrians. Yes, walkers
are a menace. Yes, they should buy a car like
everyone else. But they can still sue.
Speeding through an intersection. Two words:
James Dean.
time-webmaster@pathfinder.com
|
From Colorado State University
Research on Road
Rage:
Original can be found
here
Contact: Jerry Deffenbacher,
Psychology department
(970) 491-6871 OR
Tom Milligan, (970) 491-6432
TMilligan@vines.colostate.edu
COLORADO STATE
PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSOR BEGINS ROAD RAGE STUDY;
COMPUTER SIMULATOR TRACKS DRIVING BEHAVIOR IN
THE LABORATORY
FORT COLLINS--A Colorado State University
psychology professor will replicate snarled
metro Denver traffic and other scenarios to
determine whether certain road conditions are
likely to provoke road rage more than others.
In a study beginning
this month, Professor Jerry Deffenbacher will
use animated computer graphics and a mock car
equipped with brakes, gas pedal and steering
wheel to simulate traffic conditions that spawn
road rage in some individuals.
The aim of the study
is to gauge which traffic scenarios anger
drivers to the point they drive aggressively,
yell at other drivers or take risks that expose
others to unsafe driving conditions. By knowing
what factors are most likely to provoke road
rage and what personality types are most
conducive to expressing driving anger,
Deffenbacher hopes to develop better coping
strategies for the road.
"A lot of common
sense goes out the window when people have car
keys in hand," Deffenbacher said. "We hope this
study points out the tendencies of driving anger
in some of the most common day-to-day driving
conditions. We're doing in the laboratory what
we couldn't do safely on the road."
The estimated 90 men
and women involved in the study will use the
computer simulator to "drive" in three
scenarios, each about 12 minutes long. The first
scenario involves driving on a country road with
no traffic and pleasant driving conditions. A
second scenario simulates rush-hour traffic on
the freeway with heavy congestion and slow
speeds--similar to rush-hour traffic in downtown
Denver. In the third setting, drivers will have
to negotiate a narrow country road behind a slow
moving vehicle and oncoming traffic that
prevents passing.
Researchers also plan
to develop a fourth scenario in which another
vehicle cuts off the driver and a fifth that
involves stop-and-go downtown traffic and
includes other factors such as pedestrians,
bicyclists and traffic lights.
The drivers will
report on their feelings as they proceed through
each scenario. Meanwhile, the computer will
record the speed, number of collisions with
other cars and other performance measures.
The data will be used
to validate some of Deffenbacher's other studies
on personality types most likely to express
anger behind the wheel. Past studies showed that
high-anger individuals became angry three times
more often behind the wheel and were more than
twice as likely to display risky and aggressive
behavior on the road than low-anger individuals.
People were categorized as high- or low-anger
individuals after completing a short driving
anger questionnaire.
Deffenbacher's past
studies also revealed that high-anger
individuals express anger on the road with more
intensity than low-anger drivers, and that women
express driving anger as frequently as men.
"When driving
conditions aren't stressful, there is no
difference between high-anger and low-anger
individuals on the road," Deffenbacher said.
"However, when high-anger people are provoked,
it's a whole different story. They have a much
shorter fuse."
Deffenbacher has
several suggestions for drivers who either
frequently get angry on the road or who are on
the receiving end of road rage. The most
fundamental advice is to accept that
inappropriate, discourteous and unsafe events
can happen to anyone on the road. That
acceptance makes drivers more patient when
driving conditions are difficult. Drivers also
should avoid making eye contact, gestures, faces
or yelling at another angry driver, since
further provocation can spark intense, sometimes
lethal anger in certain individuals. Instead,
drivers should disengage from the situation by
slowing down or allowing the problem driver to
pass.
High-anger
individuals also can avoid bouts of road rage by
learning a few relaxation techniques.
Deffenbacher suggests playing favorite music or
audio book tapes as a way to lower anger and
prevent negative interactions with other
drivers. Drivers also can lower their anger by
choosing not to use profanity--which adds fuel
to the fire--and concentrating on positive
thoughts.
Commuters who
frequently get angry about road conditions
should also look at their lifestyle for possible
reasons--such as always being late. Starting out
earlier may prevent an angry episode.
"How we think about
other drivers and events on the road can make
things go from bad to worse," Deffenbacher said.
"A good deal of anger is in one's head, and that
kind of behavior can be changed."
|
|
Aggressive drivers
face road rage `test'
Education needed on stress, experts say
Bob Mitchell, Toronto
Star Staff Reporter
They have them for
alcoholics and drug users. Now speeders,
tailgaters and dangerous lane changers are
getting them.
Aggressive drivers
caught by provincial Highway Rangers in Greater
Toronto will be stopped and given ``roadside
interventions'' in the latest effort to curb
road rage.
Tickets will still be
given to deserving offenders.
But yesterday, police
also began using a questionnaire designed to
help motorists see whether their anger is under
control or if they're headed for a road rage
situation.
In the time it takes
for officers to chat with the offenders about
their actions, using the volunteer test as a
springboard, police hope the driver will have
calmed down and learned something about their
driving behaviour..
Ontario Police
Superintendent Bill Currie said dispatchers at
the Greater Toronto communications centre handle
an average of 500 calls per week about road
rage.
`We will continue to
do our full enforcement, not just hand out the
card and smile at the driver and let them go on
their way. Our primary concern is if people have
done something wrong, we'll take the appropriate
action..' Bill Currie, Ontario Police
Superintendent
``This is
astounding,'' said Currie, regional commander
for the GTA. ``It's been going up constantly. We
will continue to do our full enforcement, not
just hand out the card and smile at the driver
and let them go on their way. Our primary
concern is if people have done something wrong,
we'll take the appropriate action.
``But enforcement
alone isn't enough. An equal balance of
education and public awareness is also
required.''
The OPP is the first
force in North America to introduce the program.
After completing the 10-question card, motorists
can rate their road rage score. The card also
contains tips on how to reduce stress while
driving and how to avoid road rage incidents.
``We'll be
counselling them during this roadside
intervention,'' said Sergeant Peggy Gamble, head
of the Highway Rangers GTA team. ``The cards,
which are anonymous, will be collected and data
will be analyzed.''
Plans are under way
to use an interactive computer version of the
card, known as ``Gauge Your Rage'' at public
displays and presentations.
Gamble said a recent
test of drivers at an unnamed Toronto-area
company showed that 15 per cent of the 68 people
tested had tendencies that indicate they're
driving would ``threaten lives'' unless their
stress is reduced.
Another 31 per cent
fell into the caution category while only 2 or 3
per cent of the 68 drivers tested had their
driving totally under control and 51 per cent
were in control most of the time.
``We need to make
road rage socially unacceptable and to make
people aware of their own road rage and what
they can do to reduce their stress and anger
while driving,'' said Dr. Lorne Korman of the
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, formerly
Addiction Research Foundation. ``Anger and
driving, like drinking and driving, is a
potentially deadly mix.''
found
it here
|
SafeAuto - Road Rage
Aggressive drivers
are behind a large number of accidents on the
highway. They pull in front of others, follow
too close to the vehicle ahead, yell
obscenities, shake their hands, show obscene
hand gestures, and are simply provocative and
dangerous. They are rude and usually feel that
they are justified in the way that they are
driving or intimidating others, even if just for
the moment. Under some conditions, other drivers
consciously or unconsciously join in as they try
to protect their own driving space or edge in on
somebody else's as they try to move ahead or
laterally a little quicker than the other
drivers.
Besides putting
additional police on the road to show that
somebody really is watching, what can be done to
protect drivers in general from drivers that are
aggressive?
The first place
drivers should look is at themselves. The
individual driver needs to be aware of his or
her own driving practices and especially for
those times when stress levels may rise. The
individual driver needs to realize that traffic
in general or certain other drivers are not
necessarily out to ruin his or her day.
Drivers will differ
in how they classify aggressive driving. Drivers
who travel in heavy urban traffic with many on
and off ramps will be probably more tolerant of
certain behavior than drivers who are used to
more open roads with less frequent side
accesses. However, each driver must respond to
each individual vehicle that enters or may enter
the immediate surrounding of the driven vehicle.
Whether the other driver is classified as
aggressive or not, the aggressive driver does
not really care how he or she is graded since he
or she already figures that they are correct and
in control of the situation. Drivers are thrown
to the fate of the aggressive driver.
How can SafeAuto work
to help drivers know when they are driving
aggressively or angry?
SafeAuto works by
monitoring driver foot positions and activities.
These are then correlated with patterns that may
be indicative of driver anger and road rage, as
well as other patterns such as alertness.
SafeAuto can alert
the driver when the system determines that
driver foot activity that may be indicative of
angry driving is taking place. Foot activities
that would fall into this monitoring would
include continued quick movements of the foot
over to a pedal area such as when a driver is
arguing with a passenger during an argument or
when aggravated with drivers of other vehicles.
Quick depression of the pedals can also be
associated with anger when drivers use forward
control of the vehicle as a means to show that
they have control of their vehicle and therefore
traffic in general.
|
BBC News Online
UK 'Road rage'
driver jailed for 12 years
'Road rage' driver
jailed for 12 years An amateur rally driver who
described himself as the "best driver ever" has
been found guilty of killing a young couple in a
road rage incident. Jason Humble, 33, from Cove,
near Farnborough, Hampshire, was found guilty of
the manslaughter of Toby Exley and Karen Martin,
who died after their car was shunted into the
path of an oncoming vehicle in October last
year.
Humble was found
guilty at the Old Bailey by a majority verdict
of 10-2.
The Recorder of
London, Sir Lawrence Verney, sentenced him to 12
years in jail on each manslaughter charge to run
concurrently.
Mr Exley, 33, and his
20-year-old girlfriend died instantly when their
Ford Fiesta was forced across the central
reservation of the A316 at Hanwell, south west
London.
Humble, who is
unemployed, denied manslaughter but admitted
being the driver of a Vauxhall Senator former
police car which was seen by witnesses bumping
the Fiesta three times.
He had a string of
convictions for car "ringing" and other motoring
offences and had been convicted of a road rage
offence 13 years ago.
The judge said the
offence was aggravated because Humble had
immediately driven off and did his best to
conceal the car as well as his role in the
deaths.
He said: "Of course
no sentence imposed by this court can afford any
comfort to those families you have deprived of
their loved ones."
Humble was also
disqualified from driving for 10 years and
ordered to take an extended driving test before
he can go back on the road.
The relatives of the
dead couple were in court to see him sentenced.
Humble showed no
emotion as he was led to the cells. He will not
be considered for parole until he has served at
least half of the 12-year term.
David Perry,
prosecuting, told the trial: "Toby Exley and
Karen Martin died because the defendant became
impatient with them.
"He used his skill as
a driver - if skill it was - to nudge their car
out of the way."
Humble, who had 15
years' experience as a rally driver, said he
thought the other driver was trying to "wind him
up" by not letting him past.
He had told police:
"I just became frustrated with him - why
wouldn't he let me past ?"
Humble denied ramming
the car and said: "I sat behind him at a safe
distance and flashed him, but he ignored me."
Keith Collier, a
50-year-old car dealer from Farnborough, has
pleaded guilty to perversing the course of
justice by claiming the Vauxhall Senator had
been stolen shortly before the accident.
He will be sentenced
at the Old Bailey on Friday.
original
here
|
|
N.Y. Prosecutor
Faces Murder Charge
GOSHEN, N.Y. (AP) --
An assistant district attorney was charged
Wednesday with murder for allegedly running down
a roller skater, then driving a half-mile with
the body on the hood of his car.
Paul Harnisch faces
second-degree murder charges in the death
Saturday of Edwin Quirk, 40, who was skating
with his wife on a path that is supposed to be
free when he was killed.
Prosecutors said
Harnisch, 39, drove his car onto a bike path in
Chester, hit Quirk and injured his wife, then
continued for about a half mile with Quirk on
the hood. He allegedly stopped his car, stole a
parked car and drove a short distance before he
was stopped by police.
Earlier Saturday,
Harnisch's family called police to say Harnisch
was manic depressive and had not been taking his
medication, the Middletown Times Herald Record
reported.
Harnisch spent 10
years in the office of the Manhattan district
attorney before he was hired in Orange County in
1997.
Original
here
|
|
from
ABCnews.com
Metropolitan areas
with lower aggressive driving rates tend to be
older, more pedestrian-friendly communities with
better developed train and bus systems, the
study said.
“Maybe the driv ers
are rude in New York, but no one is getting
killed,” Kienitz said. “Rudeness isn’t the
problem. The problem is risky behavior at high
speed.”
The report used 1996
federal data, the most recent available, to
compare aggressive driving death rates in
metropolitan areas and all 50 states.
Researchers said they
excluded those rare but highly publicized
incidents in which drivers murder each other
with guns.
Instead the federal
government definition of aggressive driving was
used that includes speeding, tailgating, lane
weaving and running stop signs and red lights.
That definition was further narrowed by
excluding drug- and alcohol-related crashes.
Using these
parameters, aggressive driving was a factor in
about 56 percent of all fatal crashes.
California Community
Tops List
Topping the list of fatalities resulting from
aggressive driving was Riverside-San Bernardino,
Calif., with a rate of 13.4 deaths per 100,000
residents, according to the study.
Rounding out the top
five most-dangerous metropolitan areas were:
Tampa, Fla., with 9.5 deaths per 100,000 people;
Phoenix (9.2); Orlando, Fla., (8.1); and Miami
(8.1). Boston and New York were the safest in
terms of deaths caused by aggressive driving,
with a rate of less than three fatalities per
100,000 people, the study found.
States with the
highest rates of deaths caused by aggressive
drivers were: South Carolina with 15.1 deaths
per 100,000 people; Wyoming (13.9); Alabama
(13.7); Kansas (13.7); and Oklahoma (13.6). The
more densely populated northeastern states of
Rhode Island (3.1), Massachusetts (3.3) and New
York (3.7) had the least fatalities, the study
found.
“We simply don’t have
to accept steadily worsening congestion,
steadily longer traffic jams and inevitable part
of America’s way of life,” Gore told a group of
traffic reporters from across the country during
a meeting at the White House.
Gore said the
government would develop a nationwide telephone
number that drivers could call for up-to-date
traffic reports. The number would be either 211
or 511.
He also highlighted
legislation that was passed in 1998 and is now
being implemented, that allows employers to
offer cash and tax incentives of up to $240 per
month to subsidize costs for commuting by public
transportation or car pools. “If it makes good
economic sense, folks are going to do it,” Gore
said.
|
|
KATHRYN MARCHOCKI,
Union Leader Staff LONDONDERRY
Kolhonen said Friday
he got threatening calls for two days, the
latest just hours before he found his car
engulfed in flames early that morning. "This
just proves even more that I wasn't the bad
guy," he said, referring to last Sunday's
alleged road rage incident. Kolhonen said he ran
into the back of Maria Fernandez's Volkswagen in
North Andover after she deliberately jammed on
the brakes. But witnesses, including an off-duty
police officer, said Kolhonen tried to use his
vehicle to ram Fernandez's car off the road
after he became enraged because he was cut off
in traffic. Fernandez, of Danville, told police
Kolhonen's vehicle pushed her car along the road
at 55 mph even though she was standing on the
brakes. The off-duty auxiliary Lawrence police
officer said Kolhonen was slamming into the VW
and trying to force it off the road. Fernandez
pulled into a parking lot at one point during
the incident and Kolhonen pulled alongside.
A third car carrying
David Acheson, 27, of Plaistow, and Joseph Nici,
21, of Danville, joined them. Kolhonen said one
of the men leaned into his car and punched him
in the face several times while another
threatened him with a small knife. The two men
are charged with assault. Fernandez and her
passengers were not charged. Kolhonen pled
innocent to five counts of assault to murder and
related charges in connection with the road rage
incident. He is free on bail. Meanwhile,
Kolhonen's neighbors are on edge.
Original
here
|
|
STERLING - State
police are commending the quick action of an
Interstate 190 motorist for reporting a “road
rage” incident by cellular phone Friday,
enabling police to stop the drivers allegedly
involved. The incident began on the highway and
spilled over onto Sterling and West Boylston
roads, according to Lt. Paul C. Mahoney. At one
point, one of the drivers allegedly tried to run
the other down. Joseph Miller, 17, of Leominster
was arraigned in Clinton District Court Monday
on two charges of assault with a dangerous
weapon (a knife and a car) and various motor
vehicle violations, according to Mahoney.
Miller's case was continued until March 16, a
court clerk said.
The other driver,
Matthew Casassa, 21, of Sterling, will be
summonsed to Clinton District Court on a charge
of driving so as to endanger and other motor
vehicle violations, Mahoney said. Michael
Beaudoin, 20, of Leominster, a passenger in
Casassa's car, will be summonsed on a charge of
assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (a
screwdriver).
Police were advised
by the telephoning motorist that a red Geo and a
red Mustang were racing after each other on the
highway, Mahoney said. The motorist was able to
describe the incident and give police
information about the direction the two vehicles
went.
According to the
report, Miller, who was driving the Geo, made an
obscene gesture toward Casassa in the Mustang.
Casassa then “responded by riding on the rear
bumper of the first individual at speeds in
excess of 80 mph,” a state police press release
said. Miller then waved a large knife out of his
car window. The knife was later recovered in the
car by police, Mahoney said.
After the vehicles
left the highway, the incident escalated,
according to Mahoney. “At some point, these two
vehicles stopped and both drivers and the
passenger got out,” he said. That was on North
Row Road in Sterling.
“It's alleged the
operator of the Geo tried to run down the driver
of the Mustang, and the passenger of the Mustang
attempted to assault the driver of the Geo (with
a) screwdriver,” Mahoney said.
A short time later,
state and Sterling police arrested Miller on
Route 12 in Sterling. State police stopped
Casassa on Route 12 in West Boylston.
Mahoney said road
rage incidents seem to be increasingly common on
area highways. “With cellular technology, we're
certainly getting a lot more calls about it,” he
said. “I don't know if there's more reporting or
if it's a phenomenon that's increasing. I think
it's probably something that's happening more
and more.”
Original
here
|
|
Suspect in incident
remains in jail on $4,000 bond.
Matt Sebastian Camera
Staff Writer
Boulder County
sheriff's deputies arrested a Northglenn man
Friday after he reportedly confessed to
brandishing a laser-sighted handgun at another
motorist on U.S. 36 near Davidson Mesa.
Jeffrey Montford, 35,
is scheduled to be charged Tuesday in Boulder
County Court with felony menacing in connection
with this week's incident.
"I talked to him
yesterday and he admitted to waving the gun,"
Deputy Rick Ferguson said Friday. "He claims he
didn't point it at anyone."
The victim, a
Thornton man, told sheriff's investigators he
was driving to Boulder at about 6:50 a.m.
Wednesday when Montford passed him on the
turnpike and "raised his hand and began tapping
on his watch," according to a police report.
Montford appeared to
be in a hurry, the victim said. Both the victim
and his passenger began "mocking" Montford,
mimicking his watch-tapping.
A short time later,
between Davidson Mesa and the Foothills offramp,
Montford's car appeared alongside the victim's
vehicle.
Montford allegedly
pulled out a Beretta 9 mm handgun, with a
laser-sighted scope, and pointed it at the other
driver.
The victim's
passenger told police he saw the laser from the
scope "sweep across the car" and appear on the
driver's forehead.
"It seems that all
these really minor traffic matters blow up into
these things with guns," Ferguson said. "It's
really crazy."
The deputy added,
though, that the victim and his passenger "kind
of provoked this thing. The guy was obviously in
a hurry and they were making fun of him."
Original
here
|
2 Girls Charged In
Road Rage Attack
DALE CITY, Va. (AP)
-- A 25-year-old woman who authorities say had
her head smashed repeatedly into the street
during a traffic argument with two teen-age
girls has died from her injuries.
Natalie Davis died
Thursday, two days after police say she was
attacked while driving to a church service with
her children, ages 2 and 4, and four other
relatives.
Prosecutor Paul Ebert
said Teresa Dixon, 18, and a 16-year-old girl
will now face murder charges. Both suspects were
held without bond and a preliminary hearing was
set for Aug. 10.
Ms. Dixon had been
charged with aggravated malicious wounding.
Information about the 16-year-old was withheld
due to her age, but Ebert said he will seek to
try her as an adult.
Police say Ms. Davis
and her family encountered a car blocking the
entrance to the cul-de-sac where they lived
Tuesday night. Several girls had gathered around
the car to talk.
Ms. Davis asked the
teens to move the car, but the driver of her car
managed to maneuver around it. Two teens
followed the family in another car, police Sgt.
Kim Chinn said.
Words were exchanged,
and after a short distance, Ms. Davis and the
16-year-old girl left their cars to argue, Ms.
Chinn said. The teen eventually grabbed Ms.
Davis by her hair and pounded her head into the
pavement, she said.
Dixon allegedly
joined in, stomping on Ms. Davis' head, police
said. One of Ms. Davis' relatives flagged down a
police officer.
By
Associated Press Online
|
Calls to 911 reveal road rage terror:
New details emerge as girl's family prays for
miracle
By Blair Anthony
Robertson Bee
The Sacramento Bee
(...).
The Andersons made
two 911 calls beginning at 12:32 a.m., the first
after a motorist began driving erratically and
later tried to run the family off the road.
The two calls provide
new, vivid details about how the ordeal
escalated from a minor encounter on the city's
streets to what authorities are calling a case
of road rage that left a girl fighting for her
life at UC Davis Medical Center. Her parents
have said doctors already have prepared them for
the possibility Kimberly will never walk again.
"We're very, very
strong believers in God," an exhausted Peggy
Anderson said in an interview Monday night. "I'm
praying for a miraculous recovery. The doctors
have said there's nothing left they can do for
her spine. So it's in God's hands."
Kimberly was shot
after the family retreated in their Kia Sportage
to the parking lot of the Cafe Melange in
Sacramento's Curtis Park near the Anderson's
home. Police arrested Brad G. Odell, 33, on
suspicion of attempted murder and he was held
without bond. He is expected to be arraigned
today.
Real Audio Listen to
two of the 911 calls:
". . .a really
bizarre drunk driver is doing wheelies on 24th
Street. . ."
". . .somebody in a
blue car just shot my daughter. . ."
(...)
Moments before the
shooting early Saturday, the Andersons were
already consumed with fear. They told the 911
dispatcher they were reluctant to drive home
because the motorist, later identified by police
as Odell, was following them and nearly caused
them to crash near 24th Street and Broadway.
"A really bizarre
drunk driver is doing wheelies on 24th Street,"
Peggy Anderson told the dispatcher when she
placed the first emergency call.
Then she screamed,
"Oh my God! Oh my God!"
(...)
The Andersons were on
their way home from a movie when they
encountered the erratic motorist. The 911 calls,
made available to The Sacramento Bee on Monday,
were answered by the California Highway Patrol,
which handles emergency calls placed on cell
phones even when inside the Sacramento police
jurisdiction.
Sacramento police
said Monday that the initial traffic encounter
and subsequent shooting were unprovoked.
"This man tried to
run the Andersons off the road and Mr. Anderson
was being a good Samaritan in trying to report
it. They were innocent victims," said Michele
Quattrin, a Sacramento police spokeswoman.
At an emotional press
conference Saturday, Orrin Anderson explained
that he blew his horn when Odell first cut him
off but otherwise did not try to engage the
motorist. He said he followed the motorist to
get his license plate number but begged off when
the situation grew dangerous.
As the incident
unfolded early Saturday, the Andersons placed
the second 911 call. This time Peggy Anderson,
the girl's stepmother, is screaming and her
husband is racing to the emergency room. The
dispatcher tries to get them to pull over and
wait for an ambulance, but Peggy Anderson
refuses.
She said Monday that
as she was placing the second 911 call, her
husband was heading east on Broadway at speeds
close to 100 miles an hour, honking repeatedly
to warn other motorists until he arrived at the
medical center.
The following day,
Kimberly was in good enough spirits to dictate a
message of forgiveness to Odell. But on Monday,
the girl was back on a respirator in critical
condition and in tremendous pain, according to
Peggy Anderson. Meanwhile, calls of support have
poured in by the dozens, she said.
(...)
original
here
|
'Road Rage' Victim Speaks Out
Police Think Suspect Might Be
A Doctor Traveling Overseas
MINNEAPOLIS, The
elderly victim in a local "road rage" attack
still doesn't know why the other driver lost it.
For the first time, the woman spoke out today.
Virginia Hendrickson,
70, was behind the wheel of her car when the
driver of a white BMW forced her to pull over on
August 11. The man then allegedly hit her in the
face.
The woman said she
was preparing to enter southbound Highway 77
(Cedar Avenue) at Cliff Road in Eagan, Minn.
when the man, who was driving a white BMW Z-3
Roadster convertible, got her to pull over about
8:15 a.m.
"She thought he was
just trying to stop her from going onto the
highway," said the patrol's Cpl. Paul Gorski.
"She doesn't remember doing anything wrong."
The man apparently
became angry, yelled at her and hit her,
breaking her glasses, Gorski said. She sustained
a bruise. He sped off when someone else
intervened, according to WCCO-TV.
(...)
If a suspect is
caught, he could face felony assault charges.
original
here
See follow up story
in next box.
|
Road Rage Killer Gets Death
He Wrote About How Good It Felt to Kill
DALLAS (AP) -- A
former financial analyst was sentenced to death
after testifying that road rage led him to shoot
and kill two truck drivers and injure a third
man he suspected of being a truck driver.
Douglas Alan Feldman
confessed in testimony and in letters to opening
fire on the drivers, Robert Stephen Everett and
Nicolas A. Velasquez, in August 1998.
Jurors deliberated
less than 90 minutes Tuesday before sentencing
Feldman, 41, to lethal injection.
Everett, 36, was
killed on U.S. 75 north of Dallas. Feldman, who
was riding a motorcycle, had contended that
Everett almost ran him over. Velasquez, 62, was
fatally shot 40 minutes later at a Dallas
gasoline station.
'I found it quite
pleasurable'
"I will tell you
this: I found it quite pleasurable to kill those
two men!" Feldman wrote a former girlfriend in
December 1998, two months after his arrest.
"If you are an angry
person and someone provokes you to violence ...
it feels wonderful to cause their death and to
watch their pain." The letter was read in court
by a prosecutor.
(...)
Nothing the defense
presented could stand the test of the evidence
or Feldman's lack of remorse, jury foreman Steve
Joachims said.
"In his written hand,
he confessed and communicated that he would do
it again, that he was actually happy about it,"
Joachims said. "Very sad."
A paramedic, Cynthia
Manion, had testified that she and Velasquez
prayed together and he spoke of his family as he
was being taken to a hospital.
"He wanted them to
know how much he loved them," she said. "He
didn't understand why it had happened. ... This
person had just come up and shot him." Velasquez
died later in surgery.
Feldman also admitted
shooting a third person, Antonio Vega, in
September 1998 because he thought he was a truck
driver. He survived.
|
'Road Rage' Doctor Pleads Guilty
Anesthesiologist Calls Incident 'Unthinkable'
APPLE VALLEY, Minn.
-- A Twin Cities anesthesiologist pleaded guilty
Thursday afternoon to misdemeanor assault
charges in a highly publicized "road rage"
incident.
Thomas Valente, 44,
of Burnsville, Minn., did not appear in court
Thursday. Instead, his attorney, Joe Friedberg,
entered a guilty plea on his behalf to
fifth-degree assault, WCCO-TV reports.
"He is distressed
about it," Friedberg told WCCO-TV. "Probably not
as distressed as the victim, but he intends to
do whatever he can to make it right."
(...)
Valente admitted in
his statement Thursday that his behavior was
"unjustified" and "irrational," and he called
the incident an "unthinkable act" and expressed
regret that it happened.
Friedberg told the
court that his client has entered counseling for
his "anger management problem."
(...)
He faces a maximum
penalty of 90 days in jail and a $700 fine.
original
here
|
Road Rage Puts Little Girl In Danger
Driver Jumps Out Of His Car In A Fit Of Road
Rage
CLEVELAND
It probably happened
to you -- a car cuts you off, or someone starts
tailgating. Your heart pumps faster, your blood
pressure rises, you start to get angry and then
before you lose it you calm down.
(...)
Witness Ernest Martin
says he watched the man in the van actually go
off the road and cut back in and try to cut in
front of Orahoske. Ernest Martin and his wife
were traveling down I-71 too, right behind
Orahoske's pick up and the van that was trying
to run the man off the road.
"There was a point
there where I felt fear for myself because I
knew he wasn't going stop," Orahoske says.
The federal
government defines road rage as any act intended
to threaten, injure or kill another person. And
Orahoske is convinced that's what the van driver
intended to do when he pulled up next to his
daughter's window.
(...)
original
story here
|
'Oh My God, I Can't Believe I
Shot Her'
In Alabama, Road Rage Engulfs 2 Women and
Suburbia
By Alan Sipress
Washington Post Staff Writer
ALABASTER, Ala.—The
two drivers had been battling for about four
miles, jousting for position in the heavy
rush-hour traffic streaming homeward from
Birmingham along southbound Interstate 65. After
one vehicle cut off the other one, they played a
cat-and-mouse game, tailgating, lane-changing,
slamming on brakes until they got off at the
same exit.
Gena Foster, 34, was
racing to pick up her daughter Francie, a
4-year-old with a mop of blond hair, at an
after-school program for children with cerebral
palsy. Shirley Henson, 40, was on her way home
to her husband and dogs in a quiet cul de sac.
But when the two cars came to a stop at a
traffic light on the darkened exit ramp, Foster
jumped out and started toward the immaculate
black sport-utility vehicle idling behind her.
Inside the Toyota
4-Runner, Henson reached into the console next
to the seat, where she kept a .38-caliber
revolver and a cell phone. As Foster approached
her door, Henson lowered the window about
halfway and reached for the revolver. She fired
a single shot, striking Foster in the left
cheek. Foster crumpled to the pavement, blood
gushing from her face, dying. She never made it
to school.
Nor did Henson, a
secretary at a prominent construction company,
ever reach her home in one of the countless new
subdivisions that have transformed Shelby County
over the last decade from a hilly expanse of
dairy farms and limestone quarries into one of
the fastest-growing counties in the South.
Instead, she spent the night in the county jail
charged with murder. Out on $50,000 bond, she
now awaits a Dec. 1 court hearing.
But while the Nov. 8
killing was unprecedented in the
upper-middle-class community of
Alabaster--consistently ranked as the safest
place in Alabama--authorities say it shouldn't
come as such a surprise. The county's explosive
growth has turned a 20-mile commute to downtown
Birmingham into a roughly hour-long ordeal of
stop-and-go traffic, and guns are easily
accessible. Law enforcement officials estimated
that at least half of all motorists in this part
of Alabama--and perhaps significantly more--keep
firearms in their cars.
"I expect there'll be
more situations such as this because of heavy
traffic and the guns being so prevalent and
people not knowing when to use them and how to
use them," said Police Chief Larry Rollan.
"Everybody's got a gun."
"Both people were
probably stressed out," said John Ward, state
president of the National Safety Council.
"Birmingham is growing, especially Shelby
County, and the roads haven't been able to keep
up. There's a lot of tension and pressure when
you have bumper-to-bumper traffic."
(...)
A study this year by
the Surface Transportation Policy Project, a
research and advocacy group based in Washington,
reported that aggressive driving was more
frequently associated with the stress of driving
in sprawling suburbs than in older urban areas.
The analysis found that Alabama ranked third in
the country in the rate of death from aggressive
driving. (This figure includes fatal crashes
involving aggressive behavior though not
roadside murders.)
Henson kept the
revolver, for which she had a permit, stashed in
her SUV for protection at the urging of her
husband and brother, according to her lawyer,
David Cromwell Johnson. Few here seem to fault
her for keeping the .38 close at hand. "You take
away someone's handgun only by prying it out of
their icy dead grip," said Kevin Miller, host of
an evening talk show on WERC radio in
Birmingham. In fact, nearly half his callers
support Henson for pulling the trigger.
"If I'm in my car and
somebody comes running up to my car, I sure
would shoot them. I'm sorry, but that's just the
way it's gonna be," said a caller named Becky.
Another caller, Bobby, who also carries a gun in
his car, said: "You don't know the intent of the
lady that was coming at her. . . . If I believe
they're going to harm me, they're going to get
shot."
(...)
As Foster headed out
into the dusk toward I-65, Henson was leaving
her job at Harbert Corp. atop a forested hilltop
less than two miles away. They reached the
interstate at nearly the same time and pulled
out into heavy but moving traffic.
About two exits to
the south, Foster jutted into the left lane,
cutting in front of Henson and almost clipping
the SUV, said Jim Hardy, who was driving behind
them. Henson seemed to flash her headlights at
Foster, he said. Foster hit her brakes. "They go
back and forth. The 4-Runner pulls up on the
bumper and then gets back," Hardy said. The
contest continued for four miles, police said,
as the traffic wound past silhouetted pine trees
and shadowy hills.
Both vehicles left
the interstate at the Alabaster exit, a straight
ramp that slopes upward to a traffic light at an
overpass. Henson moved into the right lane,
preparing to turn toward Alabaster. Foster, who
most evenings would move into the left lane and
turn toward Columbiana, also pulled to the
right, stopping her Pontiac in front of Henson,
police and witnesses said.
Foster bolted from
her car, leaving the door open. She headed back
to the SUV, parked about seven feet behind. Her
arms were out. She was yelling something no one
could hear. "She was mad. Her eyes were wide
open," Hardy said. As other cars pulled up to
the traffic light, Foster came up to the partly
open driver's window.
(...)
Foster dropped. Blood
gushed from her face, painting a swath down the
ramp nearly two feet wide. Henson dropped the
revolver onto the passenger seat beside her
briefcase. This time she reached for the cell
phone and dialed 911. But she quickly became
hysterical.
She remained frozen
in her seat, weeping, said Lisa Adney, another
motorist who helped her complete the call.
Henson glanced at the body by the door and
quickly looked away. "Oh my God, I shot her,"
she repeated over and over. "Oh my God, I can't
believe I shot her. Oh my God, I can't believe
she's dying."
© Copyright 1999
The Washington Post Company
|
Trial to begin in
road-rage shooting death
NANCY WILSTACH News
staff writer
Shirley Chapman
Henson stands trial on a murder charge in
Columbiana this week, but she claims she killed
Gena Newell Foster in self-defense because she
was afraid the angry woman was going to kill
her.
The unusual nature of
the case - a road-rage killing in which both the
victim and the accused were women - has
attracted national attention.
Mrs. Foster was shot
to death on the Interstate 65 South off-ramp in
Alabaster last November after the two women had
jockeyed for position in rush-hour traffic,
witnesses said.
(...)
After the aggressive
driving between Valleydale Road and the
Alabaster exit - a distance of about eight miles
- accounts differ as to which woman drove onto
the exit ramp first.
Shelby County
District Attorney Robby Owens has said a jury
may have to decide whether Mrs. Henson followed
Mrs. Foster off the interstate or whether Mrs.
Foster passed Mrs. Henson on the ramp. Both
would have used that exit anyway under normal
circumstances.
Pulled in front?
Johnson said Mrs.
Foster pulled in front of Mrs. Henson, blocked
traffic and got out screaming obscenities.
In an interview just
after the killing, Johnson said Mrs. Henson "was
afraid she was going to die. The woman spit in
her face."
(...)
Mrs. Foster was shot
in the face and was dead at the scene.
Johnson is awaiting a
ruling from Shelby County Circuit Judge D. Al
Crowson on whether he will be able to use Mrs.
Foster's toxicology results in his opening
statement. The flamboyant Johnson, known for his
aggressive defense maneuvers, has said he wants
to tell the jury that Mrs. Foster was "under the
influence of narcotics."
Owens said the
autopsy report shows Mrs. Foster had taken a
Darvocet, for which she had a prescription,
earlier in the day to counteract a migraine
headache.
(...)
Mrs. Foster lived
with her three children in a mobile home in
Columbiana and worked as a solderer at CMS in
Riverchase.
Mrs. Henson, free on
$50,000 bond, lives in one of Alabaster's newer
subdivisions and is an administrative assistant
at Harbert Management Corp., also in Riverchase.
Johnson described his
client as "a very nice 40-year-old lady who's
got a son and is married and lives in Alabaster.
She raises dogs, golden retrievers. She has
never been in trouble in her life."
Owens has said the
jury should examine the many moral questions
surrounding the escalating frustrations of armed
drivers on the county's increasingly congested
highways.
Jury selection begins
this morning and is expected to take most of two
days.
© 2000 The
Birmingham News. Used with permission.
original
here
|
Jurors in `road
rage' case asked about
driving habits, guns
By JAY REEVES The
Associated Press
COLUMBIANA, Ala. (AP)
-- Ninety-four potential jurors were asked about
their driving habits and attitudes toward guns
as a secretary went on trial for murder in the
"road rage" shooting death of another female
motorist.
Jury selection
continued Tuesday in the trial of Shirley
Henson, 40, who is accused of shooting Gena
Foster, 34, at close range as Foster approached
Henson's car on an Interstate 65 exit ramp last
year.
The defense claims
the shooting was in self-defense. Prosecutors
contend Henson, still seated in her car, killed
Foster with a single shot to the face after the
two jockeyed for position for several miles on
the busy interstate while driving home from work
during rush hour last Nov. 8.
Foster had gotten out
of her car at the top of the exit ramp and
approached Henson's sport-utility vehicle, which
was stopped directly behind Foster's car.
Defense attorneys say
Henson was afraid and defending herself when she
opened fire. The confrontation happened on a
dark, crowded ramp, and Henson could not tell
whether Foster had a weapon, they contend.
(...).
Gathered in a
courtroom Tuesday, the prospective jurors were
asked by prosecutor Randy Hillman if any of them
had been on the receiving end of "really bad
driving."
(...)
More than a dozen
said yes to the question.
But only three
answered yes when asked if they had ever done
anything "that you're not proud of" as a driver.
Along with detailed
personal information, would-be jurors were asked
in a 16-page questionnaire Monday whether they
carry a weapon and if they have ever been
involved in a "road rage" incident.
Attorneys also tried
to determine whether potential jurors had ever
been involved in some of the driving tactics
witnesses have described seeing in the moments
leading up to the shooting.
"Do you consider
yourself an aggressive driver or do you
sometimes tailgate when you drive?" read one
question.
"Do you believe that
a person should NEVER use a gun to defend
themselves under any circumstances?" read
another.
(...)
|
|
Woman found guilty
of manslaughter
in 'road rage' shooting death
COLUMBIANA, Alabama
(AP) -- A woman was convicted of manslaughter
rather than murder for shooting a motorist she
had been tailgating during a road-rage
confrontation.
Shirley Henson, 40,
could receive anything from probation to 20
years in prison for the Nov. 8 shooting death of
Gena Foster, a 34-year-old mother of three, on
an interstate exit ramp.
Henson, who was
convicted Tuesday, could have been sentenced to
life in prison had the jury found her guilty of
murder.
(...)
Henson said she shot
Foster because she feared for her life.
Prosecutors said Henson could have simply driven
away if she was afraid.
(...)
Defense lawyer David
Cromwell Johnson argued that Foster was entirely
to blame. He portrayed the victim as a
drug-addled wild woman who refused to let Henson
pass and then tried to kill her on the ramp.
(...)
Foster's mother,
Patricia Newell, said Henson has never expressed
any remorse and should go to prison.
"In the United States
we've got to do something about road rage. We've
got to stop it," Newell said, her eyes reddened.
(...)
|
Woman
sentenced to 13 years
for 'road rage' killing
COLUMBIANA, Alabama
(AP) -- A woman was sentenced Monday to 13 years
in prison for the "road rage" shooting death of
another woman motorist on the exit road of a
busy interstate.
Shelby County Circuit
Judge Al Crowson denied probation as he
sentenced 40-year-old Shirley Henson, who was
convicted of manslaughter in the roadway killing
of Gena Foster, a 34-year-old mother of three.
(...)
Henson showed no
emotion when the judge read the sentence.
Crowson said everyone
has "a little road rage" inside, and he knew his
sentencing in this case would be closely
watched. He said neither probation nor the
maximum sentence of 20 years was appropriate.
Copyright 2000 The
Associated Press
|
Man faces 7 charges in road-rage shooting
Detroit News staff
PONTIAC -- A Detroit
man has been charged with assault with intent to
murder and could face life in prison following
what authorities said was a road rage incident
that ended in gunfire. Jerrod Henry, 30, came
inches from shooting a man to death during the
Friday incident on Interstate 75 in Auburn
Hills, according to state police. Henry was
arraigned Sunday morning on seven charges
including the assault count. He remained in the
Oakland County Jail late Sunday on a $500,000
bond. State police said Henry, his wife and two
children, ages 4 and 8, were driving north in
the far left lane about 2 p.m. Friday and were
followed by Henry's sister in another car. Both
had to merge right when their lane ended. Henry
was able to merge in front of a Chevrolet
Suburban, but his sister had to brake and merge
behind the Suburban, said Sgt. Dennis Sano.
Henry then allegedly moved to the center lane
beside the Suburban and fired two shots from a
9mm handgun. One of the shots missed the
driver's head by inches.
|
Girl Gets 18 Years in Road-Rage Beating Death
Pummeled Young Mother in Traffic Dispute
MANASSAS, Va. (AP)
-- A teenage girl who beat a young mother to
death over a traffic dispute was sentenced today
to 18 years in prison.
Kurebia Hampton, 17,
read a statement apologizing to the family of
Natalie Giles Davis, 24, who was killed in a
scuffle that broke out last June in Dale City.
Hampton could have
received up to 40 years in prison for her
second-degree murder conviction.
Victim was slammed,
kicked
Davis and her family
were headed to church when they encountered a
car blocking the road out of their cul-de-sac.
Davis exchanged harsh words with the teenagers,
who jumped in another car and blocked the one
Davis was riding in.
After Davis got out
of her car, a fight broke out, and her head was
slammed to the ground and kicked. She died
several days later.
Teresa Dixon, 19, was
convicted of manslaughter for stomping on Davis'
head as she lay on the sidewalk. She was
sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison last month.
|
Reward grows to catch
road-rage driver who killed dog
SAN JOSE,
California (CNN) -- The road-rage death of a
little dog has generated what police say is an
unprecedented outpouring of donations to a
reward fund, to be offered to catch the man who
threw the dog into traffic.
VIDEO CNN's Rusty
Dornin talks with the dog's owner and to people
offering the reward. QuickTime Play Real 28K 80K
Windows Media 28K 80K
Since Leo, a
curly-haired white 10-year-old Bichon Fris, was
pulled from his owner's lap, tossed into three
lanes of traffic, and crushed by a car last
month in San Jose, California, police say they
have been inundated with tips.
A Web site
(http://interstice.com/leo/) set up on Leo's
behalf had received more than 28,000 hits by
Wednesday morning and the reward fund had grown
to $40,000, an amount police say tops previous
sums offered in child molestation and rape
cases.
"That's shocking in
itself," said Howard Johnson with the San Jose
Police Department. "This is a lot bigger than
the average case."
But Leo's owner, Sara
McBurnett, says she still cannot believe what
happened.
The Santa Monica
Humane Society has been flooded with donations
Fender bender turns
lethal McBurnett told police she was on her way
to pick up her husband at San Jose International
Airport on February 11 when a large black truck
cut her off. She said she was unable to stop her
station wagon and she hit the truck's rear
bumper.
She said she rolled
down her window as the man driving the truck
came to her car, yelling at her. About that
time, Leo jumped into her lap. McBurnett said
the man reached in and grabbed Leo.
"Then he turned and
threw him into the opposite oncoming lanes and I
watched a car run right over him," she said.
Leo died later at a
veterinary hospital.
"I was too shocked to
function," McBurnett said. "Now I keeping having
flashbacks. And remorse. Why did I open the
window? Why did I go back to put the car in
gear? I still cry at least once an hour."
Investigation focuses
on Virginia San Jose police are investigating
Leo's death as a case of animal cruelty. Based
on information provided by McBurnett and other
witnesses, they believe the suspect was driving
a dark-colored Ford Explorer with Virginia
license plates.
The Washington Post
newspaper reported in Wednesday's edition that
investigators have been organizing a photo
line-up of suspects in the case using Virginia
drivers' licenses.
The Post reports
police have a partial license plate number from
the suspect's vehicle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The road rage dog
killer is indicted
Burnett is in custody
on 100-thousand dollars bail.
A Santa Clara grand
jury has indicted a man for allegedly killing a
dog in an alleged road rage case that drew
national attention. Santa Clara police say
27-year-old Andrew Burnett allegedly reached
into a woman's car at the San Jose airport and
threw Sara McBurnett's dog "Leo" into traffic.
Burnett is in custody
on 100-thousand dollars bail.
Prosecutors say if
convicted Burnett could face a maximum of three
years in prison. He is scheduled to be arraigned
on Friday in Santa Clara.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's been 14 months
since Sara McBurnett's dog, Leo, was thrown into
a busy lane of highway traffic by a disgruntled
driver. Last Thursday, a Santa Clara County,
Calif., grand jury indicted 27-year-old Andrew
Burnett, who faces charges of animal abuse.
Burnett, a former telephone repairman, has
pleaded innocent to the dog's death. He faces up
to three years in prison if convicted of
killing, maiming or abusing an animal. He
already is jailed on unrelated charges, and the
trial is set to begin June 4.
Although she feels it
is good that the case is headed to court,
McBurnett still struggles with the memory of the
horrible day she lost Leo. She went through the
details of her veterinarian's attempt to save
him on ABCNEWS' Good Morning America.
"I carried him in,
they attempted CPR for about 10 minutes, but he
was gone," said McBurnett. "It was the most
devastating event in my life."
Flung Into Traffic
(...)
That's when he
reached in, grabbed the dog, and flung him into
the oncoming traffic lane, McBurnett said. She
tried to get Leo back but couldn't reach him in
time.
While McBurnett tried
to save the animal's life, the driver of the SUV
sped off, leaving the scene.
"I could see my dog,
right within eight feet of me, get run over by a
car right in front of me, and it ran right over
the middle of his little body," she said.
(...)
Pet lovers all over
the world expressed outraged and opened their
wallets, raising nearly $120,000 to find the
killer of the little fluffy white dog that
became a symbol in the fight against animal
abuse.
Web Site Fuels
Investigation
The police took basic
information, but McBurnett felt they had
somewhat given up on the case. So she took
matters into her own hands and had a friend
create a Web site about the case. The site,
www.interstice.com-leo, had a description of the
incident and based on the sketchy information
about the car, people could send in possible
leads.
Many people sent in
images of people who were possible suspects, and
images of vehicles that fit the description.
Several sent pictures of Burnett, who they said
they had seen driving a black SUV in a wild
manner, McBurnett said.
She also hired a
private investigator to deal with the leads. His
services were funded with a contribution from an
animal rights organization, called Our Animal
Wards.
A break in the case
occurred when police began looking into the
background of a 27-year-old San Jose resident
who disappeared Dec. 8 while on the job as a
Pacific Bell repairman. He was reported missing
along with a company van and tools and equipment
worth about $68,000.
Detectives looking
into the missing persons case thought the
employee fit the profile of the man sought in
the road rage incident.
(...)
See video report:
Road Rage Punished In
a disturbing case of road rage, a Santa Clara,
Calif., man has been charged with a felony for
pulling a dog from a car and throwing it into
oncoming traffic, killing the dog.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, April 13,
2001
Man indicted in road
rage dog death
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP)
-- More than a year after a dog's death in a
road rage incident sparked outrage among animal
lovers, a man has been indicted in the case.
Andrew Burnett, 27,
faces up to three years in prison if convicted
on a charge of killing or abusing an animal. He
was already jailed on unrelated charges.
The dog's owner, Sara
McBurnett, said a truck driver became enraged
when she got into a minor fender bender with him
in February 2000.
(...)
The small white dog,
a bichon frise that McBurnett called "my best
friend for 10 years," died later at a veterinary
hospital.
McBurnett was
inundated with condolence messages from dog
lovers around the country, and $110,000 in
reward money was collected.
Burnett has been in
jail in Santa Clara County on unrelated charges
since December.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday June 4
Trial Begins in 'Road
Rage' Killing of Calif. Dog
SAN JOSE, Calif.
(Reuters) - Trial proceedings began on Monday
for a former telephone repairman accused in the
death of Leo, the Bichon Frise -- a fluffy white
lap dog hurled into oncoming traffic in a
bizarre road rage incident that horrified animal
lovers around the world.
Andrew Burnett, 27,
faces up to three years in prison if convicted
of killing, maiming or abusing an animal.
Prosecutors said initial hearings in the case
began on Monday and jury selection was expected
to commence on Tuesday.
Burnett was indicted
by a grand jury in April, and subsequently
pleaded not guilty to charges that he seized Leo
from another motorist's stopped car on Feb. 11,
2000 and tossed him beneath the wheels of
traffic headed for San Jose International
Airport.
(...)
Despite the
high-profile nature of the case, investigators
said they had little to go on to identify a
suspect beyond McBurnett's description of the
vehicle and its driver as a thin white man in
his 20s with a goatee.
In December, however,
police received an anonymous email tip pointing
toward Burnett, whom they were already
investigating on charges that he allegedly
disappeared with a van and some $68,000 worth of
equipment while on a job as a telephone
repairman.
Search warrants of
the man's family home turned up a black sports
utility vehicle with three separate sets of
Virginia license plates, and Burnett was
eventually charged in connection with Leo's
death.
While the trial is
now under way, officials at the Santa Clara
Humane Society said they had still received no
word from police on whether or not anyone would
get the $120,000 reward for providing the
crucial tip.
``We are still
safeguarding the money,'' society spokeswoman
Leslie Baikie said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday June 08
Leo's owner testifies
dog didn't bite
By Geoffrey Tomb
Mercury News Facing
the man accused of killing her dog Leo in an act
of road rage, a weeping Sara McBurnett told a
Santa Clara County Superior Court jury Thursday
that the 10-year-old bichon frisé never
bit anyone and was never aggressive in his
lifetime.
Her voice cracking
and tears welling in her eyes, McBurnett sat 20
feet from Andrew Douglas Burnett, 27, the man
charged with animal cruelty for throwing her dog
into traffic after the two were involved in a
minor fender bender.
Asked later if she
made eye contact with the defendant while on the
stand, McBurnett said this:
``He looked away
every time.''
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday June 19
Man Guilty in Road
Rage Dog Death
By RON HARRIS,
Associated Press Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP)
- A man was found guilty Tuesday of animal
cruelty for tossing a small dog to its death on
a busy highway.
The jury took less
than an hour to convict Andrew Burnett of the
felony cruelty count. Burnett, 27, could face up
to three years in prison in the killing of Leo,
a bichon frise, in the highly publicized road
rage incident.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday June 19
Verdict Soon in Dog
Road Rage Trial
By RON HARRIS,
Associated Press Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP)
- A jury took less than an hour Tuesday to
decide the fate of a man charged with felony
animal cruelty for tossing a small dog to its
death on a busy highway.
The jury began
discussing the case at 9 a.m. Tuesday and said
it had concluded its deliberations shortly
before 10 a.m. The court said the verdict would
be read later in the morning.
Closing statements
wrapped up Monday, without the defendant, Andrew
Burnett, ever taking the stand in his own
defense.
Burnett, 27, could
face three years in prison if convicted of
felony animal cruelty in the killing of Leo, a
bichon frise owned by Sara McBurnett.
In closing
statements, prosecutor Troy Benson asked the
jury to hold Burnett criminally accountable.
``It's just an angry
man who did a grossly negligent act by throwing
this dog into traffic,'' Benson told the jury.
Burnett's attorney
maintained that his client instinctively
snatched the dog from the car after being bitten
on the hand.
(...)
``What was he
thinking when he reached into the car and
grabbed that dog?'' Benson said in closing
statements Monday.
Defense lawyer Marc
Garcia urged the jury to closely consider the
requirement of finding gross negligence. He said
the case a decision to find his client guilty of
a felony should not be taken lightly.
``This isn't a game.
This is real lives, real people,'' Garcia said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday June 21,
2001
Road Rage Dog Killer
Says He 'Loves Animals'
By Andrew Quinn
SAN FRANCISCO
(Reuters) - The California telephone repairman
convicted of flinging a dog to its death in a
notorious case of road rage says he ``loves
animals'' and did not mean to hurl the beloved
pet beneath the wheels of speeding traffic.
Andrew Burnett, in
his first interview since he was convicted this
week of killing ``Leo'' the bichon frise in a
case that provoked an international outcry, told
ABC's ``20/20'' news that he has been
``demonized'' by the public for what was
essentially a tragic accident.
``It's not fair to
demonize me in a way that I hate animals when
that's not what I do,'' Burnett, 27, said in the
interview to be broadcast Friday evening.
``I didn't kill Leo
on purpose. It was an unfortunate accident. I'm
really sorry that he died.''
(...)
``And as I jerked
back, the dog came with my finger. I proceeded
to um ... grab the dog so I could pull it off my
finger ... And I guess my natural reaction was
to drop the dog near my side,'' Burnett said.
McBurnett, in her
testimony, said that Leo scrambled terrified
through several lanes of heavy traffic before he
was hit by an oncoming car.
``He killed my baby
right in front of me,'' McBurnett said after the
jury's guilty verdict. ``The public can ridicule
me for considering Leo my child, I don't care.''
(...)
``I'm not the person
that's been portrayed in the media...I love
animals,'' he said.
But he said he grew
nervous as public outrage grew, and decided not
to come forward to confess his part in the
incident. Despite the widespread publicity,
Burnett was not identified as a suspect until
some 11 months after Leo's death when police
received an anonymous tip at a Web site devoted
to the case.
``I felt that this
wasn't a crime, and I thought that it would just
blow over,'' he said. ``It seemed like it wasn't
even about the accident. That there was a lot of
anger that was ... for the person they were
looking for. And I was nervous.''
(...)
Asked how he expected
the public to believe his account of the
incident following his conviction, Burnett said
simply ''because that's what happened.''
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday June 21,
2001
Reward Money Split in
Road Rage Case
By RON HARRIS,
Associated Press writer
SANTA CLARA, Calif.
(AP) - Five people will split a $115,000 reward
for helping to convict a man who tossed a small
dog into oncoming traffic in a fit of road rage.
(...)
John Mora, a San Jose
man who testified that he saw the incident, will
receive $75,000, the county's Humane Society
announced Thursday. Four other people, all
informants in the police investigation, will
receive $10,000 each.
Burnett's attorney
argued during the trial that his client acted
instinctively because the dog bit him.
Sentencing is
scheduled for July 13.
Burnett has been
jailed since Jan. 4 on charges connected to the
disappearance of his Pacific Bell repair van,
which was filled with $68,000 worth of
equipment.
Burnett fled from the
scene after dropping the dog in traffic and his
identity was unknown for months. The Humane
Society office was inundated for months with
tips from people throughout the San Francisco
Bay area.
``This case has
garnered more attention to animal cruelty than
any other,'' executive director Christine
Benninger said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday July 13, 2001
'Road Rage' Dog
Killer Gets Maximum Sentence
SAN JOSE, Calif.
(Reuters) - A California man convicted of
hurling a lap dog to its death in a notorious
case of ``road rage'' was sentenced to a maximum
of three years in prison on Friday after the
judge rejected his last-minute apology for a
crime which sparked an international outcry.
(...).
``I'm just very
sorry,'' Burnett, handcuffed and clad in an
orange jail jumpsuit, told the court. ``If there
is anything I could ever say or do to bring back
Leo, I would.''
(...)
Animal rights
advocates, led by Leo's owner Sara McBurnett,
said the judge was right to throw the book at
Burnett for plucking the fluffy white dog out of
her car after a minor traffic accident in
February, 2000, and hurling it to its death in
oncoming traffic.
``Andrew Burnett was
enraged by a minor incident in traffic and took
out his rage on Leo because he was the easiest
target,'' McBurnett said before sentence was
passed. ``His clear intent was to terrorize me
in the fastest and severest way he could under
the circumstances.''
McBurnett, dismissing
Burnett's courtroom statement as ``an apology
from a pathological liar,'' said he had never
shown any sign of true remorse for Leo's death.
``He was told what to
say to try to get as much sympathy from the
court as possible. I'm sure none of it was
genuine at all,'' McBurnett said, adding that
she believed he deserved as much as ten years in
prison.
(...)
The three-year
sentence came despite a recommendation by the
Santa Clara County Probation Department that
Burnett be given probation rather than jail time
for the crime.
The department
investigator noted Burnett had no prior criminal
record, and said he accepted responsibility --
if not guilt -- for Leo's death.
(...)
Burnett, a one-time
telephone repairman, was convicted last month of
felony animal cruelty for Leo's death, a bizarre
case of road rage which engrossed the San
Francisco Bay Area, known both for its
population of animal lovers and its infuriating
traffic.
Prosecutors in the
case depicted Burnett as a hot-headed driver who
exploded in rage after the accident and took his
fury out on Leo. The defense team argued the
evidence had failed to show Burnett acted with
the necessary criminal intent to be convicted of
felony animal cruelty.
(...)
He is due back in
court Monday for the start of a second trial in
which he is accused of stealing a truck and
equipment from his former employer, Pacific
Bell, in December 2000.
|
Cops Seek Crash Vigilantes Caught on Tape
BOSTON (APBnews.com) -- Investigators plan to
review a home video of residents attacking a
17-year-old motorist -- who allegedly struck and
killed a 47-year-old woman -- to see if the
neighbors should be charged with assault, police
said today.
The driver already is
facing charges that include vehicular homicide
for allegedly hitting Denise Evans with his
speeding car while she crossed the street in her
Dorchester neighborhood about 7:30 p.m. Tuesday,
police said.
A neighbor shot the
video, which shows "a number of people punching
and kicking" Cory Cassino of South Boston as he
sat in his car after Evans was hit and killed,
police Officer Cliff Connolly said.
The video was given
to local NBC outlet WHDH-Channel 7, which aired
it Tuesday night, he said. Police will study the
video to see if they can identify any of the
attackers and decide if charges should be filed,
Connolly said.
'People were angered'
Cassino would have to
decide whether to press charges against his
alleged assailants if police consider the attack
a misdemeanor crime, Connolly said. Police
cannot file misdemeanor charges unless they
actually witness the crime.
But police could file
charges if the video shows Cassino being kicked,
because kicking is considered a felony assault
in Massachusetts, Connolly said.
The neighbors
apparently attacked Cassino because they
believed he was going to drive away from the
accident, he said.
"Witnesses speculated
he was attempting to leave," Connolly said.
"People were angered, and maybe in their eyes,
they thought he was leaving."
Cited for misdemeanor
homicide
Cassino's face was
bruised, but the teen didn't require
hospitalization, Connolly said.
The teenager was
cited for speeding, driving to endanger, and
misdemeanor vehicular homicide for allegedly
driving 41 mph in a 35 mph zone, Connolly said.
Cassino will appear in court later this month
for a hearing on whether there is sufficient
evidence to continue the case, the officer said.
Evans' relatives and
neighbors were upset that Cassino was not
arrested and jailed. Police, however, had no
choice but to write him tickets and set him
free, Connolly said.
"It's not our call,"
he said. "We just don't have the right under a
misdemeanor charge to make an arrest for
vehicular homicide. It has to be seen by the
officer to make an arrest or, to upgrade it to a
felony, it has to involve drugs or alcohol. It's
the statute that determines everything."
'He's white and the
victim was black'
Cassino, who could
face a maximum of two years in jail on the
misdemeanor vehicular homicide charge, is not
suspected of being impaired when the accident
occurred.
State legislators are
attempting to revamp the vehicular homicide law
to allow police to charge motorists with
felonies for allegedly speeding or driving
negligently, Connolly said. The maximum penalty
for vehicular homicide would be 15 years in
prison, he said.
Connolly also
rejected a claim by Evans' daughter that race
played a role in how police treated Cassino.
"She thought we
didn't lock him up because he's white and the
victim was black, but obviously, that's not the
case," he said. "There have been many, many,
many incidents where police respond to a call
for a person killed by a car and there's nothing
we can do. Until the law is changed, we have to
act according to what the statute says."
By Richard Zitrin, an
APBnews.com national correspondent
Road Rage News |
1
|
2 |
3
|
4 |
5 | 6 |
7 | 8 | 9 |
10
1997
1998 1999
2000 2001
2002 2003
2004 2005
2006 2007
Road
Rage News Stories Quoting Leon James
|
|